NEPA

Collecting useful data on NEPA

A 2024 study falls fall short in shedding light on the impacts of NEPA litigation

As I’ve recently posted, permitting reform is (appropriately) in the news right now.  That means there’s also a reason for various think tanks, NGOs, academics, and others to release studies that might inform the policy debate.  One such study from 2024 that has gotten some coverage on social media recently is a report by the …

CONTINUE READING

A Way Forward?

Reducing the Number of Decisions Could Accelerate Fire Management

This is the third of a series of three posts on how to do more to reduce fire risks on federal lands.  The first post is here, the second post is here. In addressing the increasing risks of wildfire, we certainly need to scale up the resources we apply to the problem, doing more prescribed …

CONTINUE READING

Fire and Permitting Reform

Addressing the difficult parts, regulation and litigation

This is the second of three posts on proposed legislation to address the fire crisis on federal lands (the first post is here).  Last post, I talked about why this legislation is essential, and the strengths of the bill that the House passed last Congress.  In this post, I’ll talk about the parts of the …

CONTINUE READING

The Urgent Need to Address Fire Risk

We need legislative action to accelerate fire risk reduction in general

The Manchin-Barrasso energy permitting bill that I’ve posted about is not the only permitting reform bill that died with the last Congress.  The House had passed the “Fix Our Forests Act,” legislation sponsored by Rep. Bruce Westerman, a Republican from Arkansas, with a focus on trying to reduce fire risks on federal (and other) lands.  …

CONTINUE READING

The Fires in Los Angeles

Wildfire policy and the tragic fires in Southern California?

National attention is (rightly) focused on the terrible fire situation in Los Angeles.  At the moment, the top priority is supporting first responders who are trying to control the fires, prevent more damage, and help the people who have lost homes and loved ones. There is (of course) a bunch of chatter on social media …

CONTINUE READING

Government by Reconciliation  

The reconciliation process avoids the risk of a Senate filibuster. But it comes wth procedural and political complications.

The GOP’s efforts to accomplish a big agenda through the reconciliation process will face serious complications. The Byrd rule limits the use of reconciliation to achieve non-budgetary purposes. A razor-thin House majority and factional warfare will make it hard to reach deals, as will Trump’s (& Musk;s) distaste for compromise.

CONTINUE READING

Towards Better Permitting Reform

What are we trying to achieve?

This is the third in a series of posts on permitting reform.  The first post is here.  The second post is here. How could we realistically achieve permitting reform that will advance climate and environmental goals?  Answering that question requires recognizing the political realities of a sharply divided Congress and country.  Any significant change to …

CONTINUE READING

Deal or No Deal?

Should Congress pass EPRA?

This is the second in a series of posts on permitting reform.  The first post is here. Given the provisions of the Energy Permitting Reform Act (EPRA), should Congress enact it as it stands now?  Answering that question is tricky, in part because it depends both on uncertain political and administrative action, as well as …

CONTINUE READING

Should We Do Permitting Reform?

What is at stake with the Manchin bill.

As Congress wraps up its lame duck session before the new Congress and President arrive in January, there is a lot of debate about whether to move forward on permitting reform within a quickly shrinking window of time.  The basis of debate is the Energy Permitting Reform Act (EPRA) co-sponsored by Senators Manchin and Barrasso.  …

CONTINUE READING

NEPA in the Supreme Court: The Seven Counties Oral Argument

Some arguments surfaced in the discussion that the Court would do well to ignore. 

Several arguments popped up in the Supreme Court’s discussion of a major NEPA case that appealed to at least some of the Justices.  We think that they would do well to rethink them. Each of the arguments distracts attention from what ought to be the key question: what impacts should the agency take into account in making its decision? We hope, when it comes time to draft opinions, the Justices will think through the arguments a little more fully and head in a  different direction. 

CONTINUE READING

Join Our Mailing List

Climate policy is changing rapidly. Stay in the loop with expert analysis via email Monday - Friday.

TRENDING