Regulation

A Trump Rollback Hits a Roadblock

A Trump gambit to undo a key air pollution limit turned out to be a flop.

The Administration has moved more slowly, however, on actually wiping Biden’s regulations off the books.  On Friday, the D.C. Circuit decisively rejected one important effort by the Trump EPA. In doing so, it saved (at least for now) a crucial protection for public health. While it’s not impossible to imagine that the Supreme Court might intervene, doing so would probably require it to hear oral argument, given the importance and complexity of the case. That’s unlikely to happen quickly and may not happen at all,

CONTINUE READING

The Environment Dies in Darkness

Suppressing the rights of free speech and association is deadly to environmental protection.

It’s not a coincidence that the title of this post is taken from what used to be the motto for the Washington Post until its billionaire owner decided that democracy was not, after all, a priority.   Because of the inherently collective nature of environmental protection, democracy and environmental protection are inseparable.  The government’s efforts to suppress opponents have a cumulative effect, creating a climate of repression. If we want to fight global warming, we also need to fight the chilling effects of repression on First Amendment freedoms.  

CONTINUE READING

OMB’s New Grant Regulations: A Deeper Dive

A close look at OMB’s proposed rule only heightens concerns.

Is OMB’s proposed rewrite of federal grant regulations as bad as it sounds?  Sadly, the answer is yes.  Below, this posts takes a close look at some key provisions in the regulations.  Some raise constitutional problems. Others are merely bad policy, undermining merit review, deterring valuable research, and skewing research toward the politics of the moment. 

CONTINUE READING

OMB’s “Reforms” versus NSF’s Statutory Mission

NSF will need to do some serious explaining about how the “reforms” advance its scientific mission.

In terms of DEI, section 1861p-14(7) says that one factor in assessing grants is “expanding participation of women and individuals from underrepresented groups in STEM.”   Section 1855a also authorizes the Foundation to support activities to encourage women qualify for and then pursue careers in STEM.  Section 1855b contains similar language about the “participation of minorities” in science.  How is the prohibition on DEI consistent with these provisions?  If not, does the agency now believe these provisions are unconstitutional and if so, one what grounds?

CONTINUE READING

California Permits Pesticides the EU Has Banned

A person wearing a cap, face covering, and gloves walks through a field holding a cardboard box and metal equipment on a foggy day. Lush green plants cover the ground.

Guest contributor Julie Binot writes that farmworkers are paying the price of California’s weaker pesticide standards.

Guest contributor Julie Binot is an LL.M. graduate (’26) from UC Berkeley. Controversies in France over the reintroduction of acetamiprid, a pesticide, led me to look at California’s own protections. In France, the push to reinstate the neonicotinoid insecticide, banned since 2018 over risks to bees and human health, was ultimately blocked by the Constitutional …

CONTINUE READING

Trump versus Cost-Benefit Analysis

EPA’s disavowal of CBA is the culmination of a longer assault.

EPA recently said it would no longer try to quantify the harms done by the two most serious, widespread air pollutants. Given that these are the most fully understood of all  environmental impacts, it’s not clear what future regulations, if any, might be still subject to cost benefit analysis.  This didn’t come out of the blue. Rather, it is the culmination of a series of steps that began when Trump took office in 2017.  By 2018, Trump’s executive orders and other administration actions had led me to write a post about “the rise of benefit-blind analysis.”  Little did I know what was coming down the road.

CONTINUE READING

Trump and Xi Meet in Beijing

The presidents of the US and China standing on a stage and shaking hands with flags behind them

As the U.S. and China meet, climate change is NOT on the agenda.

When Presidents Trump and Xi meet this week in Beijing, climate and environment will not be on the agenda. That absence is striking, because the U.S. and China are now moving in radically different directions on climate, energy, and environmental protection. The US is in an extraordinarily anti-environmental moment. It has exited both the Paris …

CONTINUE READING

The Other Half of Climate: Policy, Capital, and the Race to Scale Superpollutant Solutions

A panel of 5 people with one person speaking and holding a microphone in front of a crowd.

Learn how California is using satellite data to pull the emergency brake on global warming.

Methane and other short-lived climate pollutants (SLCPs) are responsible for nearly half of today’s net global warming. Because they exit the atmosphere quickly, reducing them can serve as an ‘emergency brake’ on rising temperatures. At the San Francisco Climate Week, UC Berkeley’s Center for Law, Energy and the Environment (CLEE) and the Institute for Governance …

CONTINUE READING

Building Bridges Over Troubled Waters

Building Bridges Over Troubled Waters

There are environmental issues that span the partisan divide, even today.

It turns out that the solar industry has two allies in unlikely places: Trump stalwarts Kellyanne Conway and Katie Miller (the wife of Stephen Miller).  This is a reminder that, even in an era of hyper-partisanship, it is sometimes possible to create alliances across the ideological gulf.Despite polarization, there are some environmental issues that can bridge the partisan gap. T Some issues, like climate change, have become deeply polarizing. We shouldn’t give up on those, but we should also pay attention to issues that have greater potential for reaching out to Trump supporters.

CONTINUE READING

The Story of California’s Advanced Clean Trucks Regulation

Three blue and grey trucks lined up side to side behind a green text box which says "California's Advanced Clean Trucks Regulation: Key Decisions and Stakeholder Impact".

New CLEE report & webinar tells the story of this first-of-its-kind supply-side regulation for zero-emission trucks

California has been a global pioneer on electric vehicles, and that leadership extends to zero-emission trucks. To address the pollution and disproportionate impacts on disadvantaged communities, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) adopted the first-of-its-kind Advanced Clean Trucks (ACT) regulation in 2020. This landmark standard required truckmakers to begin selling zero-emission versions (such as battery …

CONTINUE READING

Join Our Mailing List

Climate policy is changing rapidly. Stay in the loop with expert analysis via email Monday - Friday.

Join Our Mailing List

TRENDING