Regulatory Policy

The National Academies school the Trump administration on gold-standard science

Cover of the National Academies report

Report on Effects of Human-Caused GHG Emissions on US Climate, Health, and Welfare shows how actual science is done

It’s not news that the Trump administration has little interest in getting the facts right. But facts often matter for crafting policy that serves our societal goals. And it’s not rare for the law to require that specific factual findings underpin government decisions. In both cases, we need to assemble, understand, and apply the best …

CONTINUE READING

DOJ Challenge to Vermont’s Climate Law Has a Problem

The EPA’s proposed repeal of the endangerment finding undermines the U.S. position in the Vermont Climate Superfund Case.

EPA’s proposal to rescind the Clean Air Act endangerment finding is not final but it is already causing problems for the Trump Administration in court.  The Department of Justice today filed a brief for summary judgment challenging Vermont’s climate superfund law. Its principal argument? That the Clean Air Act — in regulating greenhouse gases — …

CONTINUE READING

Certainty for the California Compliance Carbon Market

California’s signature climate program receives formal legislative extension through 2045.

As the California legislative session came to an end last week, Assembly and Senate leaders released a last-minute deal on formally extending California’s Cap-and-Trade Program for the next two decades through Assembly Bill (AB) 1207. The bill received the required supermajority vote on Saturday, September 13, and now moves to Governor Newsom’s desk for signature. …

CONTINUE READING

Violations of Free Speech at EPA

EPA employees were within their rights with the dissent letter they wrote.

I know it must be a shock to the Trump Administration that even lowly civil servants —  I’m sure they would put the emphasis on “servants” — have rights that Important People like them are obliged to respect.  But we still live in a democracy, and as the Supreme Court once said, government employees don’t leave their First Amendment rights at the door.

CONTINUE READING

A Clear and Present Danger to American Health

We’re all – each of us individually — less safe than we were a year ago.

RFK Jr. is purging the government of anyone who actually believes in science. What’s happening to public health under his leadership isn’t unique. All across the government, Trump is at war with science, cancelling billions of dollars of biomedical, energy, and climate research; closing EPA’s science department; replacing hard scientific evidence with climate denial as official dogma.  This is a recipe for disaster, like closing your eyes will flying a plane.

CONTINUE READING

California Issues the First State Guidance for Corporate Climate Risk Disclosure

CARB takes an important step in an emerging field of climate policy

The California Air Resources Board this week released draft guidance for corporate climate-related financial risk disclosure, providing some insight into what large companies will be required to report beginning in January 2026. This is a quiet but fairly monumental step in climate risk disclosure in the US, and a reminder of the power of state …

CONTINUE READING

Trump’s War on Wind is Dumb. It also Makes Sense.

The Drain is a weekly roundup of environmental and climate news from Legal Planet.

The Trump administration’s attack on wind energy feels dumber and dumber every day. Let’s see if we can make it make some sense. After that, the major headlines of the week. Last Friday, his Transportation Department withdrew $679 million for offshore wind projects at 12 ports. Last month, the administration sent a stop-work order to …

CONTINUE READING

The Failed Effort to Protect Workers from Toxics: A Labor Day Reflection

The OSHA law called for rigorous regulation. It never happened.

To put it in a nutshell, the political base for workplace toxic regulation eroded along with America’s industrial unions.  That deprived OSHA of the congressional support it needed to thrive. In the absence of a union revival, the right of workers to be free from toxic hazards is likely to remain an unfulfilled dream.

CONTINUE READING

Which Effects Count?

Conservatives argue that only the effects that they care about should matter.

Not that long ago, conservatives demanded that the government balance costs and benefits.  They still do, but with a twist: They demand special limits on consideration of environmental effects. But that makes no sense.  Whatever rules we have about costs should apply to all types of costs, and the same with benefits.  The result of the skewing the analysis is, not surprisingly, that we get conservative results more often.

CONTINUE READING

The Woeful Economics of a Misguided Rollback

The costs of Trump’s rollback of key climate rules far outweigh any benefits.

Trump’s rollback of regulations limiting emissions from power plants is an economic disaster. According to economists, health damages far exceed savings from lower compliance costs. Just considering health impacts alone, the net cost of the rollback will be $129 billion through 2050. Climate damages add another $148 billion in costs.

CONTINUE READING

Join Our Mailing List

Climate policy is changing rapidly. Stay in the loop with expert analysis via email Monday - Friday.

TRENDING