Regulatory Policy

The Overlooked Precedent Supporting EPA Regulation of Greenhouse Gases

An Encouraging Signal About Federal Preemption

Even Roberts and Scalia agreed that Mass. v. EPA is the law

An important precedent has been overlooked in the coverage of the Trump EPA’s repeal of the 2009 Endangerment Finding. The 2009 finding relied was based on , in which the Court had held that the Clean Air Act covers air pollution and directed EPA to determine whether greenhouse gases are harmful. One reason to worry about the litigation is that the conservatives Justices all dissented from Massachusetts v. EPA over the repeal.  But there’s another equally important precedent: American Electric Power v. Connecticut (AEP). That ruling was joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Scalia, so it may carry more weight.

CONTINUE READING

A.I. Pollution in the Air — and the Public Comments

On a red background someone holds up a megaphone that blasts out envelopes representing messages.

The Drain is a weekly roundup of environmental and climate news from Legal Planet.

Artificial intelligence has already replaced some artists, translators, and podcast hosts. Now it’s coming for… concerned citizens? That’s right. AI-assisted campaigns have started flooding the inbox of government agencies that seek to engage with the public. Do you remember last June when the South Coast Air Quality Management District Board killed two common sense clean …

CONTINUE READING

In the Cross Hairs

The Right has taken umbrage at some of the important work of environmental law professors and centers.

The fossil fuel industry and its conservative allies seem to have taken notice of the important work done by environmental law centers. Their response is to try to repress this valuable work.  This is a backhanded acknowledgement that law schools are making a difference.This campaign has targeted some of the law schools with the most prominent environmental law programs.  Climate scientists have long been the target of harassment and public attack. It appears that people who work on climate policy are now also in the crosshairs.  What we’re seeing lacks the drama of other attacks on free speech and academic freedom. But it is capable of being no less harmful. McCarthyism writ small is still McCarthyism.

CONTINUE READING

How to Create Permit Certainty?

What might be a good path forward for the FREEDOM Act?

This is the third post in a series looking at the most recent proposed legislation for permit certainty, the FREEDOM Act.  Part one, discussing why Congress is considering permit certainty and its importance, is here.  Part two, analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of the bill, is here. The good parts of the bill – making …

CONTINUE READING

Analyzing the FREEDOM Act

Permit certainty bill has beneficial judicial review provisions, but problematic provisions for damages and compensation.

This is the second post in a series on the FREEDOM Act, a bill in the House of Representatives to address the issue of permit certainty.  Part one, explaining why permit certainty is now a hot topic in Congress, is here. All of the reforms in the FREEDOM  Act turn on the creation of a …

CONTINUE READING

The FREEDOM Act and Permit Certainty

Permit certainty bill has potential, but also some problems that could make it unworkable

As one advocate for permitting reform aptly noted, “permit certainty” is now a prerequisite for any action on permitting reform in this Congress.  That’s because the Trump Administration’s war on renewable energy means that Democrats have no desire to do a deal that would not, in practice, make a difference for investment in new clean …

CONTINUE READING

Taking Care That the Law Be Fitfully Executed

A picture of the heads at Mount Rushmore.

Carrying out the law is the core duty of the President. And it’s being openly violated.

The parameters of presidential power have been debated since soon after George Washington took office.  But the Constitution makes at last one thing crystal clear: the President must “take care that the laws be faithfully executed.”  This is a task to which the current incumbent, it can be safely said\, has not applied himself.

The “take care” clause is reinforced by the very terminology used to describe the President’s authority, the clause vesting the “executive power” in the President. That’s a clause much beloved of believers in the unitary executive. The word “executive” traces back to exsequii, meaning to carry out or follow (ex meaning “out”, sequii meaning “follow”). Faithful obedience to Congress hasn’t exactly been a hallmark of the current Administration. Whatever it is that Trump is faithfully executing, it’s not the laws of the United States. Unless, a bit darkly, you were to take “execute” in the modern sense of killing off, not in the constitutional sense of carrying out.

CONTINUE READING

Keeping Coal on Life Support

A drawing that depicts a man in a suit with a white hard hat that reads, "Mine, baby, mine" while hugging a humanized piece of coal in work uniform within a coal mine.

Trump is doing everything he can to boost coal. And still, the industry is on life support. 

The good news for investors is that coal is behaving like much of the non-AI stock market this year. Yet this growth is taking place on a very low baseline, which had slumped well below from Great Recession levels.  If investors are to be believed, Trump may be able to keep the coal industry on life support. But it’s still in the ICU.  

CONTINUE READING

The Decline and Fall of the “Regulatory Czar”

Now, the office doesn’t even have a home page, and its boss is lawyer who faces possible disbarment.

OIRA, the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, was known as “the most powerful agency you’ve never heard of.  That was only three years ago. Under Trump, however, OIRA seems to have become a minor subdivision of the Office of Management and Budget run by Russell Vought.  The main purpose of the office was to oversee the use of cost-benefit analysis by regulatory agencies.  The Trump Administration has all but abandoned this analytical tool by refusing to quantify regulatory benefits, so it’s now cost-benefit  analysis. As a result, OIRA seems to be adrift. One sign of this declining importance is that it’s hard to even find the name of the person running the office.

CONTINUE READING

“Smog and Sunshine” Has a Release Date

The colorful flyer cover of Ann Carlson's book titled, "Smog and Sunshine: The Surprising Story of How Los Angeles Cleaned Up Its Air," which has palm trees and the skyline of Los Angeles faintly in the background covered by layers of pink, orange, and blue hues.

And this “Surprising Story of How Los Angeles Cleaned Up Its Air” is now available for preorder.

My book, “Smog and Sunshine: the Surprising Story of How Los Angeles Cleaned Up Its Air,” will be released on April 7!  It’s been a long time coming. My author page is here And you can find links to preorder my book by clicking here or here Here’s how UC Press describes the book: Los …

CONTINUE READING

Join Our Mailing List

Climate policy is changing rapidly. Stay in the loop with expert analysis via email Monday - Friday.

Join Our Mailing List

The Drain is a roundup of climate and environmental news from Legal Planet delivered to your Inbox once a week.

The Drain

TRENDING