Year: 2012
Does Any Pollutant Mean ANY Pollutant?
It got less attention than it should because it was upstaged by the Supreme Court’s healthcare decision, but last week’s D.C. Circuit ruling on climate change was almost as important in its own way. By upholding EPA’s regulations, the court validated the federal government’s main effort to control greenhouse gases. To the extent that the …
Continue reading “Does Any Pollutant Mean ANY Pollutant?”
CONTINUE READINGThe Chief Justice’s “Switch in Time” — Practically Huge But Legally Minimalist
“The switch in time that saved nine” is how one wag described a key vote change by a Justice during the New Deal. The “saved nine” part may or may not apply, but Chief Justice Roberts obviously switched his vote in the healthcare case. I can’t remember a case in which the opinions made this …
Continue reading “The Chief Justice’s “Switch in Time” — Practically Huge But Legally Minimalist”
CONTINUE READINGWhy Did Mono Lake Become a Cause Celebre?
Why did saving Mono Lake become such a potent political issue during the late 1970’s and early 1980’s? For a book I am currently writing on the case, that is a critical question. After all, hundreds of groups — hundreds of environmental groups — seek media oxygen for their cases all the time. Both nationwide …
Continue reading “Why Did Mono Lake Become a Cause Celebre?”
CONTINUE READINGConditional Spending and the Clean Air Act
Ann suggests that Chief Justice Roberts’ opinion today in Sebelius might open up the Clean Air Act to new challenges. That seems right, but it also seems to me that there are two key differences between Medicaid and the CAA/Highway Spending nexus. 1) Medicaid is an entitlement program; in other words, federal money flows more …
Continue reading “Conditional Spending and the Clean Air Act”
CONTINUE READINGAnother (Mostly) Uninformed Post About the Health Care Cases and Environmental Law
I’ve only skimmed the opinion (National Federation of Independent Businesses v. Sebelius) but so far don’t think the Court’s holding that the health care law’s individual mandate violates the Commerce Clause will have any real effect on environmental law. The Court’s decision is concerned with whether Congress can require someone previously unengaged in commerce — …
CONTINUE READINGThe Health Care Cases: Instant Uninformed Reaction!!
1) Wow. On the specific issue here, I’ll take it. 2) Environmental lawyers will need to look at this decision very carefully. From an initial very quick parsing, it appears as if Chief Justice Roberts’ opinion has cut back the scope of Commerce Clause authority and under the Necessary and Proper Clause as well as …
Continue reading “The Health Care Cases: Instant Uninformed Reaction!!”
CONTINUE READINGFinally: An Environmentally Conscious Environmental Organization
Give so much as a dime to any environmental organization, and you are on their mailing list for life. And that’s just the start: you’re on the mailing list of every other organization they share lists with. The mail starts to pile up fast, as does the annoyance at going through it. Notice something? All …
Continue reading “Finally: An Environmentally Conscious Environmental Organization”
CONTINUE READINGLos Angeles Climate Change Adaptation
My UCLA colleague Alex Hall has released a high quality micro-geography report highlighting within Los Angeles variation in heat wave risk in the medium term future. I salute his efforts. This type of research is exactly what I expect more climate scientists to deliver namely high quality information that is correlated with what Mother Nature will …
Continue reading “Los Angeles Climate Change Adaptation”
CONTINUE READINGDC Circuit 1, Roy Cohn 0
“I don’t want to know what the law is. I want to know who the judge is.” — Roy Cohn There’s one more important point about today’s per curiam DC Circuit ruling that should be emphasized: the composition of the panel. Two members were Clinton appointees: Judith Rogers and David Tatel. But the third was the …
Continue reading “DC Circuit 1, Roy Cohn 0”
CONTINUE READINGStanding and the EPA Greenhouse Gas Emissions Decision
As I described in my earlier post of today about the Coalition for Responsible Regulation v. EPA decision upholding the Environmental Protection Agency’s greenhouse gas emissions rules, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals found that the plaintiffs — groups representing large industrial and manufacturing facilities and states that oppose any greenhouse gas regulations under the Clean …
Continue reading “Standing and the EPA Greenhouse Gas Emissions Decision”
CONTINUE READINGJoin Our Mailing List
Climate policy is changing rapidly. Stay in the loop with expert analysis via email Monday - Friday.
