Breaking News: Brown Approves California Cap-and-Trade Linkage to Quebec’s System

California Governor Jerry Brown will allow the state’s Air Resources Board to link its cap-and-trade program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions with a Quebec cap-and-trade program modeled after California’s.  Brown sent a letter to CARB today making four findings that he is required to decide before allowing the linkage to go forward.  CARB must still take several steps before the systems fully link but has continually expressed its intent to expand its cap-and-trade program beyond California borders.  If the state goes forward as expected the linkage between the American state and the Canadian province will mark the first time two cap-and-trade programs have been linked together.  In practical terms, as CARB explains, “Linking two such programs means that compliance instruments (i.e., emission allowances and offset credits) issued by two jurisdictions can be used interchangeably for compliance in either jurisdiction.”

California’s cap-and-trade program was adopted by CARB as part of its implementation of the state’s Global Warming Solutions Act.  The Act, passed as AB 32 in 2006, contemplated that the state consider linking its regulatory efforts with those of other states and countries:

The Legislature anticipated the possibility of linking with programs in other jurisdictions, finding that “national and international actions are necessary to fully address the issue of global warming,” and directing ARB to consult with other states and nations “to facilitate the development of integrated and cost-effective regional, national, and international greenhouse gas reduction programs.”

Though CARB has worked closely with Quebec for more than a year to develop regulations that would allow the jurisdictions to link,  the California Legislature slowed that effort last year when it adopted SB 1018 last June.  SB 1018 requires the Governor to make four findings before allowing any cap-and-trade linkage to proceed.  The four findings include

1)  that the jurisdiction with which California seeks to link has program requirements to reduce greenhouse gases that are at least as stringent as California’s, including for program offsets;  the Governor found that Quebec’s program is more stringent than California’s in its emission reductions limit and that it has many program elements that are nearly identical to the state’s;

2)  that the state be able to enforce its laws against regulated entities within Quebec to the maximum extent permitted under the U.S. Constitution;  Brown found that the linkage will not limit California’s enforcement authority against its own emitters and that — even though California cannot enforce against Quebec regulated parties that are located solely within Quebec — Quebec has sufficient regulatory authority to enforce against its own emitters;

3)  that Quebec have enforcement authority at least as strict as California’s authority; Brown found that Quebec does in fact have such authority;

4)  And finally, that linkage will not impose any significant liability on California; Brown found that legal immunities that limit lawsuits against the state will not be abridged in any way and that Quebec’s rigorous enforcement program will provide further protection against any state liability.

Before linkage can go forward CARB must still adopt final regulations, something that will likely occur shortly.   Once that happens California and Quebec will work together to ensure a smooth transition to linkage.  But the real hope on California’s part is that this linkage is just the first of many such linkages so that the state can be at the forefront of creating a cap-and-trade market across multiple jurisdictions.  The central aim is to expand the size of the market for emissions reductions in order to lower overall compliance costs and to persuade additional states and provinces — and ultimately even countries — to follow California’s lead in cutting carbon emissions.  Today’s linkage decision is a big and important step in that direction.

linkage means that allowances and offsets of each program can be used to satisfy legal obligations

, , ,

Reader Comments

6 Replies to “Breaking News: Brown Approves California Cap-and-Trade Linkage to Quebec’s System”

  1. Interesting comments.
    But isn’t there a misunderstanding of the context is which this linking is being designed ?

    The whole text has not one mention of the Western Climate Initiative (WCI), while this partnership initiative is central to the linking.
    You have written «[California] to link its cap-and-trade program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions with a Quebec cap-and-trade program modeled after California’s.» and « [CARB] has continually expressed its intent to expand its cap-and-trade program beyond California borders».
    The fact is that Québec has not «modeled [its C&T] after California’s» and California is not «expand[ing] its cap-and-trade program» into Québec. Indeed, both California and Québec have modeled their own C&T systems after the WCI model. The WCI model has itself been designed by 5 or 6 active partners (out of initialy 11 partners) in the WCI, including California and Québec, but also Ontario, British Colombia, Washington and Oregon states ( see http://westernclimateinitiative.org/the-wci-cap-and-trade-program/program-design).
    Now, California and Québec are working out the link between their two sovereing C&T systems based on the guidelines agreed in that same WCI «Program design» agreement. And we both (California and Québec) hope that other partners will be able to link their C&T system to, under the same conditions, as soon as possible !

    Salutations cordiales du Québec !

    Benoit St-Jean
    Professional in International Commerce and Sustainable Development
    In redaction of a master degree on the WCI and Latin America

  2. Interesting comments.
    But isn’t there a misunderstanding of the context is which this linking is being designed ?

    The whole text has not one mention of the Western Climate Initiative (WCI), while this partnership initiative is central to the linking.
    You have written «[California] to link its cap-and-trade program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions with a Quebec cap-and-trade program modeled after California’s.» and « [CARB] has continually expressed its intent to expand its cap-and-trade program beyond California borders».
    The fact is that Québec has not «modeled [its C&T] after California’s» and California is not «expand[ing] its cap-and-trade program» into Québec. Indeed, both California and Québec have modeled their own C&T systems after the WCI model. The WCI model has itself been designed by 5 or 6 active partners (out of initialy 11 partners) in the WCI, including California and Québec, but also Ontario, British Colombia, Washington and Oregon states ( see http://westernclimateinitiative.org/the-wci-cap-and-trade-program/program-design).
    Now, California and Québec are working out the link between their two sovereing C&T systems based on the guidelines agreed in that same WCI «Program design» agreement. And we both (California and Québec) hope that other partners will be able to link their C&T system to, under the same conditions, as soon as possible !

    Salutations cordiales du Québec !

    Benoit St-Jean
    Professional in International Commerce and Sustainable Development
    In redaction of a master degree on the WCI and Latin America

  3. Thanks for your post on the linkage of the Californian and Quebec ETS schemes. I wanted to let you know that other linkage deals of this kind are also being pursued by the Australian government. In August last year, the Australian government and the European Commission announced an agreement to link the Australian carbon pricing mechanism and the EU ETS from 1 July 2015, thereby creating the largest carbon market in the world. Providing the Australian scheme survives the federal election due in September 2013, the linkage will proceed from 2015 on a one-way basis (EUAs able to be imported into the Australian scheme) and then two-way from 1 July 2018.

    Jacqueline Peel
    Professor in Environmental Law, Melbourne Law School, Australia; Visiting Scholar, CLEE, Berkeley, 2012-2013

  4. Thanks for your post on the linkage of the Californian and Quebec ETS schemes. I wanted to let you know that other linkage deals of this kind are also being pursued by the Australian government. In August last year, the Australian government and the European Commission announced an agreement to link the Australian carbon pricing mechanism and the EU ETS from 1 July 2015, thereby creating the largest carbon market in the world. Providing the Australian scheme survives the federal election due in September 2013, the linkage will proceed from 2015 on a one-way basis (EUAs able to be imported into the Australian scheme) and then two-way from 1 July 2018.

    Jacqueline Peel
    Professor in Environmental Law, Melbourne Law School, Australia; Visiting Scholar, CLEE, Berkeley, 2012-2013

Comments are closed.

About Ann

Ann Carlson

Ann Carlson is the Shirley Shapiro Professor of Environmental Law and the co-Faculty Director of the Emmett Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at UCLA School…

READ more

POSTS BY Ann