2021: The Year in Review

After the dark days of the Trump Era, environmental policy had a very good year

The continuing pandemic sometimes makes it feel like time is frozen. But 2021 was a big year for environmental policy.

Politics.

The biggest news of 2021, for the environment as well as other reasons, was the replacement of Donald Trump by Joseph Biden. On the regulatory front, the change in White House control instantly stopped the tide of rollbacks. The Biden Administration has begun to reverse those rollbacks. It is also  seeking to implement important new regulations of its own, such as stringent new controls on methane emissions by the oil and gas industry. In December, EPA finalized new fuel efficiency standards for vehicles, undoing a Trump rollback and going somewhat beyond Obama’s prior requirements.

In another key political development, Democrats won both of Georgia’s Senate runoff elections, given the Democrats working control of the Senate by the tiniest of margins. The Democratic margin in the House is a bit bigger, but still uncomfortably thing.

Legislation.

Democrats were able to leverage those thin margins into passage of a $1.2 trillion infrastructure law, of which about half is new funding. The law provides a heady influx of money for public transit, rail, electric vehicle charging stations, and transmission. It also closed a loophole that gave states the power to kill transmission projects they didn’t like. The new transmission capacity is needed to support greater use of renewables. There was also major new spending to improve drinking water safety and fund other environmental programs.

The Courts.

On the judicial front, the D.C. Circuit struck down Trump’s reversal of Obama’s keystone climate policy, the Clean Power Plan.  In a very worrisome development, the Supreme Court reached out to review that decision even though EPA had already said it was going to rethink the Trump regulation anyway. The conservative Justices appear eager to gut EPA’s authority to regulate power plant emissions. Most other pending litigation against Trump’s actions were put on hold and sent back to agencies following the change in administrations.

The States.

At the state level, there was a lot of action, just as there had been throughout the Trump Administration.  Here are a few of the notable developments:

  • North Carolina and Illinois both passed major new climate and clean energy policies in surprisingly bipartisan fashion. In a sane world, those would presage similar bipartisan at the federal level. Unfortunately, that does not seem to be the world we’re living in.
  • Washington State adopted a cap-and-trade system and a bevy of other climate measures.
  • Oregon required the elimination of all carbon emissions from its electricity system by 2040.
  • Massachusetts set a 2050 net-zero target, with interim targets of 50% decreases in 2030 and 75% by 2040 (compared with 1990 levels).
  • All Nebraska utilities (which are all government bodies) set carbon neutrality targets for midcentury.

The Globe.

Internationally, there were lots of developments:

  • The US rejoined the Paris Agreement and pledged to slash 2005 carbon emissions in half by 2030.
  • Another big news item was China’s decision that it would no longer support the construction of coal-fired power plants in other countries.
  • The EU and the US pledged to cut global methane emissions 30% by 2030.
  • The courts in France and Germany ordered their governments to ramp up their climate efforts in order to meet the Paris Agreement’s goals.

Of course there were also setbacks, most notably Sen. Manchin’s surprise decision to abandon negotiations over Biden’s Build Back Better bill.

Who knows what the future will bring? If we’ve learned anything over the past five years, it’s the peril of making predictions. What we can say is that 2021 turned out to be a very good year for the environment.

, , , , ,

Reader Comments

4 Replies to “2021: The Year in Review”

  1. A paramount question is will cutting “global methane emissions 30% by 2030” be enough soon enough!?

    The reality check: “Who knows what the future will bring? If we’ve learned anything over the past five years, it’s the peril of making predictions.”

    And how can you say: “What we can say is that 2021 turned out to be a very good year for the environment” when it was one giant step closer to Hell of Earth”? That’s just what Global Warming Deniers want you to say!

  2. P.S. Dan, I respect you more than any other environmentalist on Legal Planet but, PLEASE reread carefully and rethink before pressing the “POST” button, and I should know, I need to do that more myself. I also respect Biden more than anyone else in Washington, but he makes me want to cringe when he can’t convince a majority to make the right things happen with the required sense of urgency.

    So one more time I implore, because of the failures of our best politicians meet the challenges of change:

    We most desperately need to dedicate Berkeley to multidisciplinary studies to Save the Human Race TODAY when our civilization must have leaders who can solve multidisciplinary problems before time runs out on us. The way we do things now is not working as current events prove daily.

    1. Anthony — I think it’s a matter of perspective. Compared to where we need to be, progress has been frustratingly slow. But we ARE making progress. We would be far worse off if Trump had been reelected, so at least we are back on track for now.

  3. Dan, I respect what you say, and for the sake of our newest generations, I pray that you all make the right things happen in time.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

About Dan

Dan Farber has written and taught on environmental and constitutional law as well as about contracts, jurisprudence and legislation. Currently at Berkeley Law, he has al…

READ more

POSTS BY Dan