The Environment and the Conservative Dilemma
Trump may shake up GOP’s anti-environmental coalition.
However this election comes out, conservatives face a major problem. As the ascendancy of Donald Trump shows, a substantial share of the GOP base – probably a majority — doesn’t care much about core conservative principles. Notably, Trump’s strongest allies, Rudy Giuliani and Chris Christie, do not have histories as staunch conservatives. This situation leaves the Paul Ryan part of the GOP, and the conservative intelligentsia, in a quandary.
Many Republican voters seem perfectly happy to support a candidate who is indifferent to traditional tenets such as free trade, balanced budgets, colorblindness, and cutting entitlements. They seemingly care more about jobs and economic security, along with resentment of immigrants, minorities and elites. For traditional conservatives to join this group, they would have to surrender many traditional beliefs. They would also be tying themselves to a political strategy with very uncertain long-term prospects, since it involves alienating growing parts of the electorate (younger voters, college graduates, and minorities). It is also a strategy that strains the long-term ties between the Republican Party and big business, which may begin to see Democrats as providing a more stable economic environment. After the election, we should get a sense where the Ryan Republicans will go; no doubt the answer depends in part on the election results.
It will be particularly interesting to see what happens with “reform” conservatives – a mostly younger group of conservatives who believe the movement needs rethinking. Among other things, they call for a rethinking of conservative views of climate change. Their general approach is exemplified by David Brooks comment that conservatism, “[s]hrouded in obsolete ideas from the Reagan years” erred “because it didn’t believe in using government as a tool for social good.” Environmental law is all about using government as a tool for social good. Some like-minded commentators argue for taking science seriously, and they are open to considering solutions like a carbon tax. If the GOP goes down in flames on November 8, this will give them an opening to argue for a reorientation of conservative politics. But if Trump prevails, they will be cut loose within the GOP and will either have to try to form a kind of party-in-exile or look outside the GOP for a home. They will not be alone – business interests and traditional GOP suburban and college-educated voters will also have to reorient themselves.
It’s not clear how the political world will rearrange after November 8, and much will depend on how the GOP slate fares that day. But there does seem to be some possibility for breaking up the traditional alignment between anti-environmental groups and conservatives, thus freeing some conservatives to take more environment-friendly positions.
Reader Comments
3 Replies to “The Environment and the Conservative Dilemma”
Comments are closed.
This is as good a reason as any as to why we must implement aggressive actions today, so far we have totally failed to act in time:
UNICEF: 300 Million Children Breathe Toxic Air
http://ens-newswire.com/2016/10/31/unicef-300-million-children-breathe-toxic-air/
Does the human race have anyone who can lead us to protect our children today?
FACT OF LIFE: The United Nations concept has been proven to be a total failure to protect the long-term future of the human race from self-destruction due to violence and inequalities, and no scholars and think tanks have created a successful solution to protect the human race that can be implemented in time now that destructive climate changes are out of control at 400 ppm.
QUESTION: If we can’t save the long-term future of the human race from current levels of holocaustal violence and inequalities, how can we prevent the destructive consequences of global warming we are already experiencing from getting totally out of control?
Really!? Have you folks at Legal Planet have really failed to find solutions that we can implement today before time runs out Dan?
Is communicating directly with those of us among the unanointed masses still prohibited by your Ivory Tower culture Dan?