Trump Administration

Environmental Groups and the New McCarthyism

The Administration’s search for a vast leftwing conspiracy could ensnare some environmental groups.

The White House’s reference to a “vast network” rings a historical bell. A speaker seventy years ago decried “a conspiracy on a scale so immense as to dwarf any previous such venture in the history of man.” That speaker was Joe McCarthy.  Environmental groups weren’t active during his time, but does anyone doubt that they would have been on his hit list?

CONTINUE READING

The Legal Barricades Protecting State Climate Policy

The general legal landscape favors state regulatory efforts.

The upshot is that it will be very challenging for the Feds to overturn state emissions regulations of power plants and other facilities.  The statutory and doctrinal landscape are favorable for states playing defense, and the Supreme Court seems if anything more favorable to the states than the national government. Of course, these general observations leave plenty of room for litigation over the fine points, and the Feds could win some cases. But the states start the contest with an advantage.

CONTINUE READING

Guess What? The Next 2 Weeks Are “National Energy Dominance Month”

October 17-31 has now been proclaimed to be an entire month, courtesy of Trump.

“National Energy Dominance Month.”  So typical of Trump: a bungled exercise in foolish bravado. The “bungled” part is that they forgot to designate October as a special month until it was halfway over.  The “bravado” saturates almost every sentence, combined with the fact that the blustering has no practical effect. And the “foolish” part is about bad energy policy and bad economics.  To expand supply, he needs higher prices, but that would hurt him politically. And there’s no reason to think foreigners would pay them.

CONTINUE READING

Backfilling the federal ESA

AB 1319 is a good first step to responding to efforts to weaken the federal ESA

I wrote this past spring about a proposal by the Trump Administration to eliminate the definition of harm in the regulations implementing the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA), which might eliminate protections from habitat modification for federally listed species.  I also noted three different steps California could do to backfill the federal ESA if such …

CONTINUE READING

Revoking Monuments?

Recent Justice Department memo on National Monuments argues for Presidential power to eliminate them entirely

National monuments were a major flashpoint for public lands management under the first Trump Administration, which dramatically shrank two national monuments in Utah.  I think there was a broad expectation that the second Trump Administration would do the same, but for more monuments (including those designated under the Biden Administration), but so far not much …

CONTINUE READING

Learning from the Laureates

The 2025 Economics Prize, Technological Innovation, and the Energy Transition

In energy technology as elsewhere, Trump is hobbling American science with budget cuts and demands for political submission. The epitome of his approach is the decision to give political appointees rather than experts the ultimate decision on each project, replacing scientific merit with politics as the deciding factor. His war on science is also a war on future economic growth.  And his effort to halt creative destruction is the pathway to a stagnant economy. By trying to prop up an incumbent industry threatened by new technologies, he’s undercutting a central driver of economic growth. 

CONTINUE READING

How broad does Clean Water Act 401 certification sweep?

Recent disputes over infrastructure projects highlights the importance of the question

Another issue for ping-pong governance over the past few years has been certification under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.  For those of you who are not deep into the weeds of the Clean Water Act, Section 401 requires (a) federal agencies that are issuing licenses or permits that (b) result in discharges to …

CONTINUE READING

The War on Public Health Continues

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Friday’s layoffs announcements at CDC targeted infectious disease control

During the COVID outbreak, President Trump said, “If we stopped testing right now, we’d have very few cases, if any.”  That philosophy seems to have taken hold during his second term in office. On Friday, the Administration fired more than a thousand CDC workers, incljding the scientists and doctors who provide key information and expertise about infectious disease outbreaks.  The effect is to kneecap the government’s capacity to detect and track outbreaks.  

CONTINUE READING

Take Two

Trump Administration reasoning around the definition of take appears contradictory

I’ve written before about how the Trump Administration is proposing to eliminate the definition of “harm” in the Endangered Species Act (ESA) regulations – an action that could remove protections for endangered species from habitat modification.  The main justification that the Administration is relying upon in the proposal is a claim that the best interpretation …

CONTINUE READING

The Compact for Censorship

The so-called compact is a thin front for massive incursion into free speech and academic freedom.

A key First Amendment principle prohibits the government from discriminating on the basis of viewpoint.  This Compact contains a string of viewpoint-based rules. That’s a threat to any view the government doesn’t like, which definitely includes a belief in climate change or the benefits of renewable energy. Because violation of the agreement triggers draconian sanctions, and the Administration is the judge of what constitutes a violation, the chilling effect will be tremendous.

CONTINUE READING

Join Our Mailing List

Climate policy is changing rapidly. Stay in the loop with expert analysis via email Monday - Friday.

TRENDING