Unitary Executive Theory
Does the Unitary Executive Theory Exist? Not really.
It’s just another ideological confection to impose right-wing policies: the Supreme Court’s argument last week shows it
At Legal Planet, we often bemoan and gnash our teeth at the Unitary Executive Theory, which supposedly holds that because “the Executive Power shall be vested in the President of the United States,” Congress can not circumscribe the President’s removal authority or even his ability to manage federal agencies in any way. But last week, …
Continue reading “Does the Unitary Executive Theory Exist? Not really.”
CONTINUE READINGWhat Critics of the Unitary Executive Missed
This conservative theory has damaged democracy in unexpected ways.
You would think that some of the conservatives on the Supreme Court would start to see that their ideas about how to run the government are flawed. Sadly, there’s no evidence that they’ve seen the light. It’s true that they seem to be willing to make an ad hoc exception for the Federal Reserve, showing the truth of the saying that everyone’s scared of the bond market. But other than that, they seem happy to allow a single person’s whims to control the government. We’re going to need to figure out some new approaches if we want to have a government that implements in the law in a rational, even-handed way.
CONTINUE READINGLegal “Scholarship” and the Overproduction of Elites
What’s the point of writing about the Supreme Court when its only ideology is intellectual dishonesty?
Why do we even bother with this anymore? The New York Times breathlessly reports that the University of Virginia’s Caleb Nelson, a well-respected originalist scholar, has concluded that the “unitary executive theory,” long promoted by conservatives, is, well, bunk. “A bombshell!,” enthuses Will Baude of the University of Chicago, himself a well-respected originalist scholar – …
Continue reading “Legal “Scholarship” and the Overproduction of Elites”
CONTINUE READINGThe Unitary Executive Theory As Government-Smasher
The Supreme Court’s Imperial Presidency drive isn’t formalism: it is calculated to destroy the state.
It is a misnomer to discuss the current Supreme Court’s “jurisprudence” on anything, as if it has an approach to any legal question other than, “because we said so, libtard.” But in the wake of the Court’s lawless and arbitrary use of the shadow docket to destroy statutes and precedents for the purpose of giving …
Continue reading “The Unitary Executive Theory As Government-Smasher”
CONTINUE READING





