Unitary Executive Theory

Does the Unitary Executive Theory Exist? Not really.

A carving of a king, seemingly naked as it appears from the backside, wearing only his crown, socks, and shoes and holding a ball and a stick in his hands.

It’s just another ideological confection to impose right-wing policies: the Supreme Court’s argument last week shows it

At Legal Planet, we often bemoan and gnash our teeth at the Unitary Executive Theory, which supposedly holds that because “the Executive Power shall be vested in the President of the United States,” Congress can not circumscribe the President’s removal authority or even his  ability to manage federal agencies in any way. But last week, …

CONTINUE READING

What Critics of the Unitary Executive Missed

This conservative theory has damaged democracy in unexpected ways.

You would think that some of the conservatives on the Supreme Court would start to see that their ideas about how to run the government are flawed. Sadly, there’s no evidence that they’ve seen the light. It’s true that they seem to be willing to make an ad hoc exception for the Federal Reserve, showing the truth of the saying that everyone’s scared of the bond market. But other than that, they seem happy to allow a single person’s whims to control the government. We’re going to need to figure out some new approaches if we want to have a government that implements in the law in a rational, even-handed way.

CONTINUE READING

Legal “Scholarship” and the Overproduction of Elites

What’s the point of writing about the Supreme Court when its only ideology is intellectual dishonesty?

Why do we even bother with this anymore? The New York Times breathlessly reports that the University of Virginia’s Caleb Nelson, a well-respected originalist scholar, has concluded that the “unitary executive theory,” long promoted by conservatives, is, well, bunk. “A bombshell!,” enthuses Will Baude of the University of Chicago, himself a well-respected originalist scholar – …

CONTINUE READING

The Unitary Executive Theory As Government-Smasher

The Supreme Court’s Imperial Presidency drive isn’t formalism: it is calculated to destroy the state.

It is a misnomer to discuss the current Supreme Court’s “jurisprudence” on anything, as if it has an approach to any legal question other than, “because we said so, libtard.” But in the wake of the Court’s lawless and arbitrary use of the shadow docket to destroy statutes and precedents for the purpose of giving …

CONTINUE READING

Join Our Mailing List

Climate policy is changing rapidly. Stay in the loop with expert analysis via email Monday - Friday.

Join Our Mailing List

TRENDING