NEPA
A Critical Analysis of the Seven County Opinion
The court’s opinion ignores basic principles of law and statutory text in order to achieve a policy goal.
This is the second in a series of blog posts about the Court’s Seven County opinion. In our first post, we summarized the key points from the opinion. Here, we provide our assessment of the Court’s analysis. The Court’s analysis, especially in Part II.B, where it sets specific limits on the scope of NEPA, relies …
Continue reading “A Critical Analysis of the Seven County Opinion”
CONTINUE READINGThe Outcome of the Seven Counties Case
Court emphasizes agency discretion and judicial deference in NEPA.
The Supreme Court issued its decision today in the Seven County NEPA case (available here). For background on the case, see our prior posts here, here, here, and here, as well as our article. In this post, we’ll provide a brief overview of the opinion. Next, we’ll undertake a brief analysis of the Court’s reasoning …
Continue reading “The Outcome of the Seven Counties Case”
CONTINUE READINGExecutive Disorders
One after another, Trump has let loose destructive blasts at the environment to promote fossil fuels, mining, and logging.
We all know that Trump has issued a slew of executive orders since taking the oath of office. We also know that many of these are aimed to promoting fossil fuels, mining, and logging at the expense of the environment, while disfavoring renewable energy. Still, it’s impressive when you put the list together to see the full onslaught.
CONTINUE READINGTrump’s Self-Defeating NEPA “Reforms”
Rather than streamlining the process, Trump is gumming up the works.
Trump has taken some dramatic steps in the name of improving use of NEPA, the statute governing environmental reviews of projects. The goal is to speed up the permitting process and make it more efficient. The reality is that his efforts will create chaos and uncertainty, with the likely effect of slowing things down.
CONTINUE READINGThe $133 Million Bat Tunnel
Here’s what permitting reform in the United Kingdom can teach the United States about building and abundance.
“We’ll rip out ‘insane’ environmental rules that block growth.” “We can’t get anything built anymore. Everything takes too long.” “We will streamline environmental obligations. We will limit the cynical legal challenges that block major infrastructure projects. We will strip away the years of consultation that drown builders.” You might well expect these threats and worries …
Continue reading “The $133 Million Bat Tunnel”
CONTINUE READINGA Stealth Repeal of NEPA
Proposal from House Natural Resources Committee would effectively repeal NEPA
The Republican-controlled U.S. House of Representatives is working on reconciliation language – legislation that can pass via a majority-vote in the Senate, but only so long as it relates to fiscal matters. It looks like House Republicans are going to try and use the reconciliation process to effectively repeal the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). …
Continue reading “A Stealth Repeal of NEPA”
CONTINUE READINGFix Our Forests, version 2
A revised bipartisan proposal in the Senate is a step forward in the right direction
I wrote previously about the Fix Our Forests bill which has been passed by the House and is currently being considered by the Senate. I noted some concerns I had about its overuse of emergency authorities, its expansion of categorical exclusions, and some changes to litigation, as well as some positive features of the bill. …
Continue reading “Fix Our Forests, version 2”
CONTINUE READINGWhat are the benefits of NEPA?
NEPA’s benefits are not necessarily easy to measure, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t important
This is the seventh in a series of posts on the reasons we might have environmental review. The first post is here. The second post is here. The third post is here. The fourth post is here. The fifth post is here. The sixth post is here. Which of the various reasons that we might …
Continue reading “What are the benefits of NEPA?”
CONTINUE READINGNEPA as participatory democracy
NEPA might provide an opportunity for community-level engagement that advances public participation
This is the sixth in a series of posts on the reasons we might have environmental review. The first post is here. The second post is here. The third post is here. The fourth post is here. The fifth post is here. The last major category of potential benefits from NEPA that I want to …
Continue reading “NEPA as participatory democracy”
CONTINUE READINGNEPA as a veto point
Environmental review can empower a wider range of actors to block or hinder government projects
This is the fifth in a series of posts on the reasons we might have environmental review. The first post is here. The second post is here. The third post is here. The fourth post is here. Judicial review to enforce NEPA ensures that agencies actually take environmental review requirements seriously, as opposed to producing …
Continue reading “NEPA as a veto point”
CONTINUE READINGJoin Our Mailing List
Climate policy is changing rapidly. Stay in the loop with expert analysis via email Monday - Friday.
