Transportation

Where Should EV Chargers Go?

California set an infrastructure milestone – but how can it reach ambitious goals for EV drivers?

As the California Energy Commission proudly announced this week, the state is now home to over 200,000 publicly accessible electric vehicle chargers. This milestone is worth celebrating, both in absolute and relative terms: California has far more individual public charging ports than gasoline nozzles, and with around 2 million EVs now on the road, around …

CONTINUE READING

Immigration Law is Environmental Law

The recent ICE raid on a Hyundai-LG plant in Georgia highlights a problem in our visa system — and our politics. 

Three weeks ago, federal and state agents conducted an immigration raid at a multi-billion-dollar Hyundai-LG battery plant under construction in Ellabell, Georgia and detained some 475 workers. About 300 of these workers were South Korean citizens. 14 were from China, Japan, and Indonesia. Another 145 were from Mexico and other Latin American countries. As has …

CONTINUE READING

Why are California’s Zero-Emission Truck Standards Under Attack?

They are highly effective, as CLEE’s new Factsheet series on Zero-Emission Trucks documents.

The world of zero-emission trucks is at a pivotal moment. On one hand, the technology is rapidly advancing, and manufacturers are producing a growing number of zero-emission truck models in Europe, China, and here in California. Yet on the other hand, this clean transition is facing significant political and legal challenges from the U.S. federal …

CONTINUE READING

Can California Try Again with Vehicle Pollution Limits?

A new Sixth Circuit decision provides encouragement.

In May, Congress effectively killed the most recent efforts by California to clean up its vehicle fleet.  Although many people seem to have assumed the contrary, this may not be the end of the road for California regulators.  A new court of appeals decision is an encouraging signal that California may be able try again when the political forces in DC are less militantly anti-environmental.

CONTINUE READING

State Agencies Respond to Trump’s EV Threats

A solid list of proposals – are they enough?

The Trump Administration and Congress have spent much of the year attacking vehicle electrification efforts–everything from executive orders threatening electric vehicle policies and incentives (in the name of promoting “true consumer choice”) and the repeal of vehicle emission standards (backed by false claims of consumer savings) to the elimination of EV tax credits and manufacturing …

CONTINUE READING

Listing Trump’s Environment and Energy Executive Orders

I’m counting 35 so far. But I wouldn’t be shocked to learn that I’d missed something.

I’ve put together a list of all the Trump 2.0 executive orders that I could identify dealing with environment or energy.  Just to keep you reading, I should tell you that the most important ones are near the end. Whatever you might say about Trump, no one can question his zeal for eliminating environmental protections.

CONTINUE READING

Does Federal Law Still Preempt State Standards Relating to Fuel Efficiency?

The answer may depend on what being “in effect” means.

If a tree falls in the forest but no one hears it, does it still make a sound?  If a law hasn’t been formally repealed but can be violated with complete impunity, is it still in effect? This matters because federal law preempts state fuel efficiency standards if, but only if, a federal standard is “in effect.” Congress just eliminated any penalty for violating the federqal standards. Which means at best they have only a kind of ghostly existence, but no substance to speak of.

CONTINUE READING

Global Energy Trends

Trump or no Trump, the global economy is shifting toward clean energy.

Globally, fossil fuels aren’t disappearing but they’re not gaining a lot of ground, while renewables have been booming. Trump can’t do much to change this: right now China is a big player than we are.

CONTINUE READING

Does the Law Require Cost-Benefit Analysis?

According to the D.C. Circuit, the answer is no.

Putting aside the particulars of the case, it seems wrong to apply the same standard (monetized cost-benefit analysis) to every provision in environmental law. These provisions have different language, reflecting differences in congressional priorities. Some provisions, for instance, may be designed push industry to find innovative solutions; others may reflect Congress’s value judgments or a desire to limit EPA’s discretion.  We shouldn’t assume that the myriad differences in statutory language are irrelevant and that Congress wanted agencies to adopt the same method of making decisions in every case.

CONTINUE READING

A Very Bad House Vehicle Pollution Bill

The Fuel Emissions Freedom Act may be a stunt, but it’s worth examining

It can be hard to keep track amid all the hair-raising developments in Congress and at the Supreme Court, but last week, a group of House Republicans led by Roger Williams of Texas introduced the Fuel Emissions Freedom Act, hot on the heels of the purported (illegal) termination of California’s vehicle emissions standard waiver. This freedom-to-pollute …

CONTINUE READING

Join Our Mailing List

Climate policy is changing rapidly. Stay in the loop with expert analysis via email Monday - Friday.

TRENDING

What does UUD mean?

A key legal standard in public lands law is being used by the Trump Administration to stop renewable energy, but in the long run the Administration’s position may advance environmentalists objectives.