More On the Republican Anti-Fact Shield

So after I posted my tantrum about George Will the other day, I felt a little guilty.  Maybe I had been too hard on The Tory Bowtie.  After all, maybe his putting “facts” in scare quotes was just a slip.

Then I saw this piece on the Washington Post editorial page by Republican pollster Ed Rogers, on what the Republican base wants from a candidate.  His words, not mine:

Even though Cain won’t be the nominee, his candidacy tells us a lot about the psychology of GOP activists. Our team wants someone authentic, creative, fresh, bold and likeable. And we don’t have much tolerance for too many facts or too much information. In politics, a bumper sticker always beats an essay. Cain’s 9-9-9 is a bumper sticker; Romney’s economic plan is an essay. Perry’s rationale for giving the children of undocumented workers in-state college tuition rates is an essay. No hand-outs for illegal aliens is an effective bumper sticker.

This is getting a little too easy, people.  It’s clearly true that in politics a bumper sticker beats an essay, but that’s far from saying that your most energetic supporters don’t want your bumper stickers to be backed by an essay.  Modern-day Republicans?  Don’t confuse us with facts.

Those people still naive enough to believe in “consensus bipartisan solutions” to climate change should take note.

, , , , , ,