California
Interpreting the Clean Air Act After Chevron’s Demise
A recent Ninth Circuit case requires states to do more to achieve clean air goals.
Last week, the Ninth Circuit decided Committee for a Better Arvin v. EPA, which is both a significant air pollution case and an interesting case study in how the Supreme Court has changed judicial review of agency actions. Applying what it considered to be the best interpretation of an ambiguous statute, the Court required tougher air pollution controls for the San Joaquin Valley. The dissent argued that the decision would be a disaster in terms of policy. But is that even relevant under the Loper Bright ruling?
Enough With The Doomscrolling
Environmental Progress Does Exist – And So Does Good News
So much is awful nowadays, that we need to share good news at Legal Planet, and there actually is some. For the first time ever, German solar and wind electricity production outpaced that of fossil fuels. In 1987, forest cover in Costa Rica, one of the famously most biodiverse nations on the face of …
Continue reading “Enough With The Doomscrolling”
CONTINUE READINGThe Limits of Implementation for BACA
Potential practical limits on the scope of the initiative to rewrite CEQA
I’ve done a lot of analysis of the potential scope of the Cal Chamber initiative on the ballot this fall to fundamentally rework CEQA. However, I also want to highlight a range of constraints that I think will limit the practical impact of the initiative. In doing so, I do not want to minimize the …
Continue reading “The Limits of Implementation for BACA”
CONTINUE READINGBACA and planning
Initiative to fundamentally rewrite CEQA will have important implications for planning in California
A key question under the CEQA initiative on the ballot this fall, should it be enacted, is how it will relate to planning in California law. The question is an important one because planning has long been a key component of California land-use and environmental law. All local governments are required by state law to …
Continue reading “BACA and planning”
CONTINUE READINGEnsuring Environmental Protections Without CEQA
The legislature could take steps to address the impacts on state environmental law of the enactment of BACA this November
It seems likely at this point that the Cal Chamber initiative to significantly rewrite CEQA will pass this fall. A recent PPIC poll found over 70% support for the initiative. As I’ve noted earlier, a real concern with any change to CEQA is that key parts of California’s system of environmental protections depend on CEQA. …
Continue reading “Ensuring Environmental Protections Without CEQA”
CONTINUE READINGNinth Circuit Upholds South Coast Zero-NOx Emission Standard for Appliances
The Ninth Circuit limiting EPCA preemption is a huge and important win for clean air.
Last fall I wrote about a strangely important case about boilers, in which the Ninth Circuit would decide whether a challenged zero-NOx air emission standard adopted by LA’s air regulator was lawful. The case is important because it had the potential to significantly constrain the ability of air pollution regulators to do their jobs and …
Continue reading “Ninth Circuit Upholds South Coast Zero-NOx Emission Standard for Appliances”
CONTINUE READINGA Tariff on Data Centers Could Help Them Pay Their Fair Share
chaddavis.photography via flickr
The first in our new “Energy Corner” series, this post looks at how California could design a rate structure for large load customers to join the electric grid without burdening ratepayers.
A flurry of new comments was filed last month in Pacific Gas & Electric’s (PG&E) proposal to implement a new electric tariff bill, one specific to large-load customers (read: data centers). Such tariffs determine the electricity rates a utility can charge each class of customer, and the conditions under which it must provide service. PG&E’s …
Continue reading “A Tariff on Data Centers Could Help Them Pay Their Fair Share”
CONTINUE READINGBACA and unions
The complicated dynamics of unions and CEQA may impact this fall’s CEQA ballot initiative
In this post I will assess the labor provisions of the California Chamber of Commerce’s ballot initiative to drastically overhaul CEQA, which will be on the ballot in November. The quick summary is that those provisions turn out to generally codify current practice or law – and importantly, may not be locked-in against subsequent state …
Continue reading “BACA and unions”
CONTINUE READINGBACA and Data Centers, Part II
The inclusion of data centers within this fall’s CEQA ballot initiative may make it much harder to regulate their construction
This is the second of two posts exploring whether the California Chamber of Commerce’s ballot initiative to drastically reform CEQA might facilitate the construction of data centers in California. In the first post, I examined whether data centers fall within the scope of the initiative (and concluded they likely do so). What are the implications …
Continue reading “BACA and Data Centers, Part II”
CONTINUE READINGBACA and Data Centers, Part I
Ballot initiative may facilitate construction of data centers in California
As I noted in my initial analysis of the California Chamber of Commerce’s ballot initiative to rollback most of CEQA, one important point about the initiative is how many different projects are covered by it – despite the framing that it only covers “essential projects.” One kind of development project that is particularly controversial right …
Continue reading “BACA and Data Centers, Part I”
CONTINUE READINGJoin Our Mailing List
Climate policy is changing rapidly. Stay in the loop with expert analysis via email Monday - Friday.
