Month: October 2012
Good News On U.S. Carbon Emissions
At Copenhagen, President Obama pledged to cut carbon emissions by 17% by 2020 below 2005. According to Resources for the Future (RFF), the most respected think tank on energy issues, the U.S. is “on course to achieve reductions of 16.3 percent from 2005 levels in 2020.” RFF identifies three contributing factors: EPA regulations under the …
Continue reading “Good News On U.S. Carbon Emissions”
CONTINUE READINGEncouraging Precautionary Investment in an Increasingly Risky World
The NY Times has published an Opinion Piece about reducing wildfire risk in the American West. Due to climate change, actions such as machinery creating sparks that ignite brush are more likely to happen. When we anticipate this chain of events, what ex-ante actions should we take? Should there be more brush clearance in …
Continue reading “Encouraging Precautionary Investment in an Increasingly Risky World”
CONTINUE READINGReally, David Brooks?
I sat down at my computer this morning intending to blast away at an academic article I’m writing but only after peeking at the NY Times. I thought a little newspaper reading would be the end of my procrastination until I read David Brooks, something I don’t always do but couldn’t resist when I saw …
Continue reading “Really, David Brooks?”
CONTINUE READINGWhat Happens When You Feed Garbage Data to a Nobel Prize Winner? — The Bizarre Story of the Phantom Job Gains from Romney’s Deregulation Plan
Deregulation is one of Romney’s five steps in his plan to add jobs. But how do we supposedly know that deregulation will add jobs? It’s a fascinating story, featuring a Nobel laureate’s economic model. The model is very fancy, lots of complex math, but it’s justified on the basis of data from a discredited study. …
CONTINUE READINGCanada’s ocean fertilization flap, and its significance
There’s a ruckus going on over an experiment in ocean fertilization conducted off the coast of British Columbia in July and disclosed this week (see here, and here). The Haida Salmon Restoration Corporation, an enterprise of the Haida village of Old Massett, used a large fishing vessel to spread 100 tons of iron sulfate-rich dust …
Continue reading “Canada’s ocean fertilization flap, and its significance”
CONTINUE READINGFracking Lawsuit Filed in California Against State Agency
Earthjustice filed a lawsuit two days ago in Alameda County Superior Court on behalf of four environmental plaintiffs charging that the California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR) has failed to consider or evaluate the risks of fracking, as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Plaintiffs — the …
Continue reading “Fracking Lawsuit Filed in California Against State Agency”
CONTINUE READINGThe Truth About EPA’s Regulation of Coal
EPA has been accused of killing the coal industry by insanely over-regulating coal-fired power plants and factories. The facts are different. The Congressional Research Service is a reliable, non-partisan source of information. Here is what CRS says about the impact of the EPA rules: The primary impacts of many of the rules will largely be …
Continue reading “The Truth About EPA’s Regulation of Coal”
CONTINUE READINGIs It Bad Politics To Talk About the Environment?
In response to my post expressing disappointment about the treatment of environmental issues in last night’s debate, Dan posted this comment: I agree that the lack of discussion of the environment was disappointing. But we have to remember that the debaters were primarily aiming their remarks at a small segment of the U.S. public whose …
Continue reading “Is It Bad Politics To Talk About the Environment?”
CONTINUE READINGWhy Can’t the Presidential Candidates Even Acknowledge Environmental Harms?
I’m an Obama supporter. That’s probably no surprise. And I thought he bested Romney in last night’s debate and not just by a little. But I found myself pretty disheartened by two separate exchanges about energy last night. Here’s the first: ROMNEY: But that’s not what you’ve done in the last four years. That’s the …
Continue reading “Why Can’t the Presidential Candidates Even Acknowledge Environmental Harms?”
CONTINUE READING“I Will Fight for Oil, Coal, and Natural Gas”
That’s what Mitt Romney said tonight. Yes, this is the same man who also said, just a month ago, that he believes that humans are contributing to climate change. But his heart belongs to fossil fuels. According to Mr. Romney, maximal use of fossil fuels is also the key to economic recovery. Romney even seems …
Continue reading ““I Will Fight for Oil, Coal, and Natural Gas””
CONTINUE READINGJoin Our Mailing List
Climate policy is changing rapidly. Stay in the loop with expert analysis via email Monday - Friday.
