Public Lands Watch: Sage grouse

Interior Dept. considering revisions to protection for iconic species

The greater sage-grouse is the largest grouse species in North America, about the size of a domestic chicken.  Estimates for its historic population are that it numbered 1.1 million across the sagebrush plains throughout the Western United States and Canada.  The grouse depends on sagebrush habitat, but that habitat is declining due to a range of issues including invasive species, wildfire, and oil and gas development.  Population estimates today for these pieces are between 100,000 and 500,000 birds, with trend-lines negative.  Environmental groups have sought to list the species for protection under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) for years.  The Obama Administration sought to avoid listing through a process of changing land-management on federal public lands to reduce threats to the species.

Sage Grouse
By Pacific Southwest Region U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service from Sacramento, US – Greater Sage GrouseUploaded by Snowmanradio, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=12016910

The new administration is pushing in a different direction.  On October 11, the Interior Department issued a notice of intent to amend provisions for conservation of the greater sage-grouse in ninety-eight BLM and Forest Service land-use plans covering the bird’s habitat in ten Western states. A review of the plans ordered by Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke in June hints at the changes Interior may make. Zinke directed reviewers to consider revising plans to allow for greater energy development and giving states a greater role in management. Accordingly, the review suggested relaxing restrictions on surface disturbances under oil and gas leases in high priority sage-grouse habitat, revising or downgrading habitat areas, and increasing state involvement in aspects of management like mitigation. Interior has already acted to open sage-grouse habitat to greater resource development: the same days it issued its notice of intent, it canceled a proposed twenty-year withdrawal of ten million acres of the highest-priority habitat from new hard-rock mining claims. An October 25 hearing of the House Natural Resources Committee, which included the testimony of state wildlife officials, emphasized an increased role for states in management. Interior’s solicitation and subsequent rejection of state conservation plans soured some Western states on the sage-grouse plans when they were finalized in 2015. Congressional Democrats and environmentalists characterized the amendment process as a needless reversal of a years-long process involving multiple stakeholders.

Weakening of land-use plan protections for sage grouse creates a separate potential risk.  The 2015 plans resulted from a 2010 finding by the Fish and Wildlife Service that the sage-grouse warranted listing under the ESA, but was precluded by higher priority species. One of the reasons for its finding was a lack of adequate regulatory measures to protect sage-grouse populations. BLM and the Forest Service began a revision to land-use plans in the sage-grouse’s range in response. After the plan revisions were finalized in 2015, FWS found them adequate to forestall listing, but decided to revisit the decision in 2020. Thus, amendments that lead to a substantial reduction in protections may trigger an ESA listing, which may entail more severe restrictions. The issue came up at the October 25 hearing, with a Montana official warning that “Congress and the administration should avoid changes that undermine the foundation of the 2015 not-warranted finding.” The threat of listing may have motivated a recent warning from the governors of Colorado and Wyoming not to overhaul the existing plans. Congressional Republicans seem to have foreseen such a possibility. Rep. Rob Bishop (Utah) and Sen. Jim Risch have introduced bills this session that would delay any sage-grouse listing for a decade. Meanwhile, the appropriations bill funding Interior for 2018, passed by the House, would prevent the department from using funds to list the sage-grouse under the ESA. The same provision was included in the appropriations for Interior enacted in 2017.

Tom Schumann helped draft this blog post.

, , , ,

Reader Comments

One Reply to “Public Lands Watch: Sage grouse”

  1. BLM has cited threat to Sage Grouse as a reason they are considering removing a majority (72%) of the Onaqui wild horses from their home in the Onaqui Mountain range in Utah. According to The Cloud Foundation, there are only a few areas where the grouse and horses intersect and the horses have never been identified as one of the threats to the grouse. Comments to the BLM Salt Lake office on the removal proposal just closed Oct 31st.

    Wild horses in the west are orders of magnitude outnumbered by privately owned cattle and sheep also grazing on public lands. The Bureau of Land Management is chartered to “protect, manage and control” wild horses and burros, but the cattle/sheep interests are the ones with political influence and economic interests, so BLM primarily operates on their behalf.

    BLM is currently prohibited from slaughtering healthy wild horses and burros, but has been trying for years to gain permission to slaughter or sell for slaughter the large numbers of wild horses that they have removed from public lands at the behest of cattle/sheep farmers. Approval to do so was included in House budget language already passed, but the Senate committee has not yet acted on this language.

    Removing horses on behalf of the sage grouse is certainly a new tactic. I did not see any mention of wild horses in your blog post, and wonder if you heard about this in your research.

    Thank you for the work you do at LegalPlanet.

Comments are closed.

About Eric

Eric Biber

Eric Biber is a specialist in conservation biology, land-use planning and public lands law. Biber brings technical and legal scholarship to the field of environmental law…

READ more

POSTS BY Eric