Guest Blogger Ken Alex: Working and Natural Lands, From Sources to Sinks
Post #6 in a Series on California Climate Policy by Ken Alex, Senior Policy Advisor to Gov. Jerry Brown
Roughly 80% of California land is protected or agricultural. That includes deserts, forests, wetlands, foothills, and multiple vegetative types, as well as farms, dairies, and ranches. While an exact inventory of emissions from working and natural lands is difficult, California has determined that those lands are a source of GHG emissions rather than a sink. The reasons for that vary, but are primarily four: forest fires, agricultural practices, loss of sequestration capacity of soils, and conversion of land to development.
Determining a baseline for GHG emissions for working and natural lands is challenging but essential. A number of protocols exist, including one adopted by the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, but none of them are yet sufficiently accurate. California is working with Lawrence Berkeley Labs and others to refine the baseline calculation. In addition, data and satellite companies are working on remote emission calculations, which, if reliable, could change how land-based emissions are evaluated. California’s refined approach will be available in 2018.
It is also essential that working and natural lands become sinks rather than sources. So, we need a refined approach to forests and forest fire, including prescribed burns and thinning of underbrush. We need new strategies to improving the health of soil and the ability of soil to sequester carbon and water. We need adoption of multiple “carbon farming” techniques. And we need to protect agricultural and natural lands from development. California has developed multiple plans towards this end, including: draft Vibrant Communities and Landscapes Plan, the Forest Carbon Plan, and the Healthy Soils Initiative.
Finally, we need to change our development patterns to help preserve agricultural lands and open space. One study found that developed areas generate more than 50 times the carbon emissions than agricultural land.
Combatting climate change worldwide is as much about ensuring that working and natural lands can sequester carbon as it is about reducing industrial emissions. Rain forests, for example, absorb and sequester massive amounts of carbon, which, if released, would overwhelm the climate system. Better baseline data and greater sequestration are key to California’s efforts.
Next blog: Resilience and Adaptation
Ken Alex is the Director of the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, and serves as Senior Policy Advisor to Governor Jerry Brown and the Chair of the Strategic Growth Council.
Reader Comments
One Reply to “Guest Blogger Ken Alex: Working and Natural Lands, From Sources to Sinks”
Comments are closed.
Ken, how about some serious discussion about all that land that is used to produce feed crops for livestock that belch out huge amounts of methane in California? It takes a lot of water and a lot of land to produce those feed crops that ultimately result in massive methane emissions from cattle. And then those livestock-feed-crop lands emit lots of carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide into the atmosphere as well! Yet your first emphasis is on hacking away at already adversely-impacted forests in California …