Reviving LBJ’s Vision

Maybe What We Need is a Green Great Society

Talk about a Green New Deal is rife these days, but perhaps what we should be talking about instead is a Green Great Society. Actually, Lyndon Johnson’s vision of the great society was green from the get-go, so maybe we could just call for a renewed Great Society. What the Great Society is known for now is its anti-poverty campaign. Conservatives have focused their attacks on that for decades. But the anti-poverty effort did have some clear successes that are now deeply embedded in our society, such as Medicaid and food stamps. And there was much more to Johnson’s vision than anti-poverty efforts, including urban planning, education, and the environment.
When he announced the Great Society in a commencement speech at the University of Michigan, Johnson gave the environment a leading place. He began his May 1964 speech with the plight of American cities, where he decried “the decay of the centers and the despoiling of the suburbs.” Then he turned to the environment: “The water we drink, the food we eat, the very air that we breathe, are threatened with pollution. Our parks are overcrowded, our seashores overburdened. Green fields and dense forests are disappearing.” He added, “For once the battle is lost, once our natural splendor is destroyed, it can never be recaptured. And once man can no longer walk with beauty or wonder at nature his spirit will wither and his sustenance be wasted.”
Johnson’s Presidency was accompanied by a surge of environmental laws. Here are some of the laws he signed:
1963 The Clean Air Act
1964 The Pesticide Control Bill
The Water Quality Act
The Wilderness Act
1965 The Water Resource Planning Act
The Water and Sanitation Systems in Rural Areas Bill
The Solid Waste Disposal Bill
The Safe Water Conservation Act
1966 The Air Quality Act
National Historic Preservation Act
Endangered Species Act
1967 The National Water Commission
Wild and Scenic Rivers
Wetlands Preservation Bill
Many of these laws are remembered today only as the preludes to the stronger laws that followed in the 1970s. But these Johnson-era laws provided the foundation for that later legislation, and they set the precedent for vigorous federal protection of the environment.
Johnson never had FDR’s level of popularity, and by the time he left office he was reviled by many in his own party. His hardscrabble roughness has not been appealing to biographers. But among his very real accomplishments was launching the modern environmental era. That aspect of the Great Society vision, along with its attack on inequality, should make it an appealing model for present-day progressives.

, ,

Reader Comments

4 Replies to “Reviving LBJ’s Vision”

  1. Poor LBJ. He deserves a lot of credit for civil rights and the environment. Not so much for Vietnam and the draft. And he has been Trumped on the term “Great.” Oh well.

  2. Dan, you are avoiding the paramount solution:

    Academics are supposed to be the best and the brightest of the human race to lead us in resolving our global warming crisis but you refuse to even join together to communicate with the public as spokespersons who can protect and perpetuate an acceptable future for our civilization.

    1. Dan, I really hope you and your environmentalist colleagues realize the longer you avoid taking responsibility for solutions to our global warming problems the faster our decline and fall gets until there is no time left to implement solutions that will protect the future of our civilization.

      Right now you just keep proving Sir John Maddox’s 1999 warning that your “rhetoric of survival is not matched by resolution.” Or is Ike’s 1961 Farewell Address warning: “The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present – and is gravely to be regarded” as true today as it was then? The way things are today, these warnings may well become our epitaph.

      1. Dan, in spite of Churchill’s most powerful exhortation, I regret that I must give up on LP if we are going to protect and perpetuate an acceptable quality of life for the human race during these times of disastrous climate changes. However, I cannot give up completely, so I am choosing another blog to comment on to continue my efforts..

Comments are closed.

About Dan

Dan Farber

Dan Farber has written and taught on environmental and constitutional law as well as about contracts, jurisprudence and legislation. Currently at Berkeley Law, he has al…

READ more

POSTS BY Dan