Planet Earth as Desert Island: “Lord of the Flies” or “Gilligan’s Island”?

Or in more technical terms, the Tragedy of the Commons? Or its inverse?

Lord of the Flies is a memorable novel about a group of English schoolboys who are marooned on a desert island.  They quickly descend into savagery and violence. The book can be seen as a parable of the philosopher Thomas Hobbes’s view that human life in a state of nature is short, nasty, and brutish.

But there was actually a real shipwreck a number of years after the book was written, and that’s not what happened to the marooned boys at all. In 1965, six boys at an Australian boarding school set sail on a lark and ended up marooned on Ata, a volcanic island that towered over the sea. They stayed there until, through a lucky chance, they were seen and rescued by a passing boat fifteen months later. They had long since been given up for dead.  They had managed surprisingly well.  Here’s the report of sea captain who found them:

“By the time we arrived, the  boys had set up a small commune with food garden, hollowed-out tree trunks to store rainwater, a gymnasium with curious weights, a badminton court, chicken pens and a permanent fire, all from handiwork, an old knife blade and much determination.’

At the risk of trivializing their achievements, one might say that their story was more “Gilligan’s Island” than  Lord of the Flies. Their story is a heartening one of human cooperation and ingenuity under immensely challenging circumstances.

There’s a general tendency to believe, like Hobbes, that people become lawless and violent whenever they get the chance. It is this Lord of the Flies theory of human nature that fuels the myths of looting and violence after major disasters. As Lisa Grow Sun recounts in her article about disaster myths, reports after Hurricane Katrina portrayed New Orleans as a “snake pit of anarchy, death, looting, raping, [and] marauding thugs.” Reports of anarchy in the city were later retracted by the media.  In fact, she reports, “most of the post-Katrina violence was perpetrated by vigilantes and police.” The myth of post-disaster anarchy leads to over-militarization of disaster response, a punitive attitude toward residents, and a misallocation of resources that could be better used to provide assist rather than control the population. It also overlooks the more positive human response to disasters. Researchers have found that “[m]ost rescue work, including providing first-aid and transportation, is done by disaster victims themselves, as witnessed after the Asian tsunami in 2004, the 9/11 attacks in New York and Washington, DC, and the 2005 bombing attacks in London.”

The view that people will naturally look out only for themselves underlies an important theory in environmental law, the Tragedy of the Commons. This theory involves the fate of commonly held resources like medieval pastures open to all villagers, fishing boats on the high seas, and water in arid regions.  The theory holds that rational actors will engage in a destructive race to the bottom, each exploiting the commons as intensively and quickly as they can. The result is the destruction of the resource that they all rely on, leaving them all worse off.  The global atmosphere can be considered another type of commons, and the implication of this theory is that the world’s nations will dump as much carbon in the atmosphere as quickly as they can.

Fortunately, the tragedy of the commons is by no means inevitable, despite this theory. Elinor Ostrom won the Nobel Prize in Economics for her studies of how real communities actually manage common resources. Professor Ostrom showed how those communities managed to create and enforce social norms to protect common resources without recognizing private property rights and without government intervention.

These findings provide a more optimistic vision of the future of the commons. It is for that reason that legal scholar Carol Rose entitled her article about the common resources  “The Comedy of the Commons.”  She was using the word “comedy” in the “classical sense of a story with a happy outcome.” But more crudely, one might say that Ostrom holds out the possibility that society could be more like Gilligan’s Island than the Lord of the Flies.

Of course, neither view is entirely right. We live in a world that seems to be part tragedy of the commons, part comedy. Without that positive element of human collaboration, our chances of coping with problems like climate change would be dire indeed.

 

, , , ,

Reader Comments

3 Replies to “Planet Earth as Desert Island: “Lord of the Flies” or “Gilligan’s Island”?”

  1. You should also read a most excellent story “What Comes After the Pandemic?” in our latest CALIFORNIA Magazine Summer issue by the our Editor-in-Chief Pat Joseph, it will give you another reality check perspective.
    https://alumni.berkeley.edu/california-magazine/summer-2020/a-killer-type-virus-ends-the-world-in-berkeley

    Your conclusion “Without that positive element of human collaboration, our chances of coping with problems like climate change would be dire indeed” is absolutely correct as my comments in the past decade or so have said many times, but the reality is that I keep having to wish you folks at LP would practice what you preach in this conclusion, because you frequently do not practice what you preach.

  2. “Beelzebub” or “Skipper”?

    William Golding titled his book after Beelzebub, the god of Ekron in 2 Kings 1:2-3, who in Christian demonology is associated with Satan, or the “Lord of the Flyers.”

    According to Hobbes, a strong sovereign (“Leviathan”) is necessary to save society from the solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short state of nature. On Golding’s island, the sovereign is the Lord of the Flies. On Gilligan’s island, the sovereign is the Skipper.

    On Planet Earth, there is no global Hobbesian sovereign, although it may be argued that the US is currently an island ruled by Beelzebub, or the Skipper, depending on the administration and your point of view.

    Fortunately, other nations are cooperating to mitigate climate change. The EU parliament recently approved the European Green Deal, which is a roadmap for net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, and most signatories to the Paris Agreement are publicly committed to its goals, while investors and corporations are shifting to green technologies.

    It remains to be seen whether the US will become a desert island, ruled by Beelzebub or the Skipper, but the rest of the world seems to be leaving Hobbes in their rearview.

Comments are closed.

About Dan

Dan Farber

Dan Farber has written and taught on environmental and constitutional law as well as about contracts, jurisprudence and legislation. Currently at Berkeley Law, he has al…

READ more

POSTS BY Dan