Supreme Court haiku blues
Who knew there was a Supreme Court Haiku Reporter? Here’s its analysis of the LA County Flood Control District case decided earlier this week (h/t Megan Herzog):
The flow of water
No discharge of pollutants
Within same river
–which, I have to say, I find pretty disappointing. In response, I offer my own. Not quite the trenchant analyses of my co-bloggers on this topic, but here goes:
Nine judges answer
A stormwater question that
No one had asked. Bleh.
Other offerings?
Reader Comments
10 Replies to “Supreme Court haiku blues”
Comments are closed.
About Cara
Cara Horowitz is the executive director of the Emmett Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at UCLA School of Law. The Emmett Institute was founded as the firs…
READ more
Ninth Circuit messed up
NRDC a bit, too
SCOTUS still worst fail.
Ninth Circuit messed up
NRDC a bit, too
SCOTUS still worst fail.
This one just emailed to me to be posted anonymously:
current swirls with oil
lazy river of concrete
try again below
This one just emailed to me to be posted anonymously:
current swirls with oil
lazy river of concrete
try again below
LA River case
leads to Miccosukee blues
confounding experts
LA River case
leads to Miccosukee blues
confounding experts
Gee! I wish we had
More environmental clerks
On the supreme court
Gee! I wish we had
More environmental clerks
On the supreme court
Court improvises
Way to block river cleanup.
Sadly, no surprise.
In drafters’ favor
are permits interpreted?
Or just polluters’?
Court improvises
Way to block river cleanup.
Sadly, no surprise.
In drafters’ favor
are permits interpreted?
Or just polluters’?