States

Trump’s FEMA Review

Trump’s FEMA Council has reported back. Its basic strategy is flawed.

After much delay, Trump’s FEMA Council has reported back.  While the report has some good ideas, much of it resolves around the same strategy: move current problems from the federal government to the states rather than fixing them.  Moving responsibilities around doesn’t make them go away.  And the reality is that many states will be unable to manage these tasks efficiently.  They also lack the federal government’s capacity and economies of scale.  And while the federal government will do less itself, it will become more intrusive on state operations, so there’s no clear gain in terms of federalism. 

CONTINUE READING

Climate Journalism is “Breaking but Not Broken” 

A map of the US with a Breaking News chyron in front of it

The Drain is a weekly roundup of environmental and climate news from Legal Planet.

  The 2026 Pulitzer Prize announcements happened this week and environmental reporting was in the mix though not central enough if you ask me. Here’s where it shined: The Breaking News Reporting category was dominated by journalism covering climate-fueled extreme weather. Finalists included staff of the Seattle Times for more than 100 stories covering catastrophic …

CONTINUE READING

An Encouraging Signal About Federal Preemption

An Encouraging Signal About Federal Preemption

A new Supreme Court ruling should help states defend their climate laws.

The Trump Administration and its allies are attacking state climate laws with challenges based on preemption, arguing that federal law trumps state powers. A new Supreme Court ruling signals that the Court respects state prerogatives and isn’t willing to find preemption without a clear basis in a federal statute.  Although the facts of the case are remote from environmental law, the Court’s attitude toward preemption has broader relevance.

CONTINUE READING

Big Oil Could Pay for Climate-Fueled Insurance Hikes

A green tinted photo of oil drilling pump jacks.

The Drain is a weekly roundup of environmental and climate news from Legal Planet.

There are several ways to try to make polluters pay. California is considering a new one — empower the state Attorney General to sue oil and gas companies to recover costs on behalf of Californians specifically related to the housing insurance market. Survivors, taxpayers and policyholders — whose rates are skyrocketing as a result of …

CONTINUE READING

The Future of the Colorado

colorado river laughlin 2

There’s not enough water to go around, but there’s no agreement about what to do.

The Colorado River provides water to 40 million people and about 5.5 million acres of irrigated farmland.  There’s only so much water to go around, so how to divide up the water has been hotly disputed for over a century.  The previous agreement has come unstuck, but finding a replacement has proved devilishly difficult. I suspect that the Feds would rather avoid this political hot-potato through a state agreement.  So far, however, state negotiations haven’t been successful. Maybe the impending threat of a federal mandate will light a fire under the negotiations.  Otherwise, we are probably guaranteed years of litigation while the river runs dry.

CONTINUE READING

Democratic Governors and the A-word

Three people in black and white with a green background covered in money signs.

The Drain is a weekly roundup of environmental and climate news from Legal Planet.

The governors and legislative leaders of several blue states on the East Coast are obsessed with the A-word: affordability. So much so that several of them are looking to pull money away from state programs that boost renewable energy and energy efficiency, as a shortcut to try to lower electricity costs. In Maryland, Rhode Island, …

CONTINUE READING

Affordability Is Everywhere

How affordability concerns are informing recent developments in electricity, clean energy, and housing policy.

Affordability concerns are increasingly top-of-mind for advocates, academics, and public officials with regard to electricity generation and pricing, the transition away from fossil fuel extraction, and affordable housing. Public support for improving the grid, transitioning to a clean energy economy, and expanding the supply of housing depends on whether policymakers can ensure that the costs …

CONTINUE READING

Does Federal Law Still Preempt State Standards Relating to Fuel Efficiency?

The answer may depend on what being “in effect” means.

If a tree falls in the forest but no one hears it, does it still make a sound?  If a law hasn’t been formally repealed but can be violated with complete impunity, is it still in effect? This matters because federal law preempts state fuel efficiency standards if, but only if, a federal standard is “in effect.” Congress just eliminated any penalty for violating the federqal standards. Which means at best they have only a kind of ghostly existence, but no substance to speak of.

CONTINUE READING

Policies on the Bus Go Round and Round

The front of a bright yellow school bus in a green background.

The Drain is a weekly roundup of environmental and climate news from Legal Planet.

A year ago, the transportation manager of Northshore School District, outside of Seattle, wrote to EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin pleading with him to release frozen funding she was owed for new school buses. “We need your assistance to complete these projects and lift the financial burdens school districts are facing due to the delay in …

CONTINUE READING

Dissecting EPA’s Endangerment Repeal: Series Wrap-Up:

A figure demonstrates the possible changes in Celsius of global temperatures at 1.5, 2. and 4 degree Celsius increased in global warming.

Here’s what you need to know to understand the upcoming legal battles.

Yesterday was the last of five Legal Planet posts on EPA’s repeal of the Endangerment Finding, which it based on legal arguments that it has no power to regulate vehicle emissions of greenhouse gases.  The series began with a quick overview of the issues. The remaining posts focus on the reasons that EPA was right to issue the Endangerment Finding in the first place in 2009, the legal precedents supporting the Endangerment Finding. and the impact of the repeal on future climate actions. The bottom line is that EPA was right to issue the Endangerment Finding and wrong to repeal it.

CONTINUE READING

Join Our Mailing List

Climate policy is changing rapidly. Stay in the loop with expert analysis via email Monday - Friday.

Join Our Mailing List

The Drain is a roundup of climate and environmental news from Legal Planet delivered to your Inbox once a week.

The Drain

TRENDING