General

The “God Squad” is Subject to a Lot of Limits. But I’m still worried.

Getting an exemption from the Endangered Species Act is normally difficult. But there’s a scary exception.

The Endangered Species Act Committee has been nicknamed the God Squad, on the theory that it holds the power of life and death over endangered species.  It does the have the power to exempt from projects from the Endangered Species Act (ESA), although that’s not quite as ominous as it sounds. It’s understandable that many people freaked out when a Federal Register notice appeared announcing a meeting of the Committee relating to offshore drilling in the Gulf.  We don’t have any specifics , What we do know is that the process is complex and cumbersome, and that there are important limits on the Committee’s discretion. There’s still reason to worry, however, because Pete Hegseth actually is the one with godlike powers over endangered species.

CONTINUE READING

Climate Issues in the 2026 Governor’s Race: Building Decarbonization and Energy Efficiency

The Seal of the Governor of the State of California has the California flag in the center with a sun in he background and orange California poppies at the bottom.

Fourth in a series of posts outlining key challenges and opportunities facing California’s next governor.

(This climate issue brief is authored by CLEE’s partners at the Building Decarbonization Coalition and Caliber Strategies.) As California pushes to decarbonize, its homes and commercial buildings are a central driver of the state’s affordability, energy and infrastructure challenges. Building energy consumption (both electricity to power appliances and gas to power furnaces and stoves) is …

CONTINUE READING

Earth is Getting Darker. Here’s Why That’s Alarming

A picture of Earth that capture a blue glowing semicircle in the middle of a black starry abyss.

Some climate scientists are calling attention to yet another alarming recent climate trend: Earth’s declining reflectivity and what it may mean for feedback effects on future warming.

Some recent Earth observations are spreading new alarm among climate scientists. The observations have been reported in many scientific and environmental outlets, and have provoked a fair amount of confusion and some misrepresentation. Some scientists have been informally calling these observations “the most important climate risk you’ve never heard of.” But they have not yet …

CONTINUE READING

Climate Issues in the 2026 Governor’s Race: Water

The Seal of the Governor of the State of California has the California flag in the center with a sun in he background and orange California poppies at the bottom.

Third in a series of posts outlining key challenges and opportunities facing California’s next governor

California’s next Governor will need to grapple with a complex array of local, state, and regional water issues. Climate change, shifting population dynamics, and a changing economy are stressing California’s water systems and intensifying conflict over water resources. Floods and droughts are becoming more frequent and more severe. And there are no major new sources …

CONTINUE READING

Is Climate Journalism Up to the Task in 2026?

Multiple TVs stacked over and beside one another all display a red static image.

The Drain is a weekly roundup of environmental and climate news from Legal Planet.

We need strong climate journalism now more than ever and there’s some good news to report on that front. Important voices on the climate beat are cranking up the volume, especially via new digital platforms. But first, the bad news. We now know that 2025 was Earth’s third warmest year on record — featuring firestorms …

CONTINUE READING

Five Lessons from the Tariff Case

What can the case teach us about litigating environmental cases against Trump?

Learning Resources v. Trump, the recent tariff ruling, doesn’t say anything direct about environmental cases.  But there are a series of useful lessons for environmental litigators. One obvious one is that the conservatives aren’t all “in the tank” for Trump (though Alito and maybe Thomas seem have gone pretty MAGA).  Trump’s nasty insults of the conservatives who ruled against him probably won’t bring them back onto the Trump train. His effusive praise for the three conservatives who voted for the tariffs may even increase frictions within the supermajority. Here are five more lessons. 

CONTINUE READING

The Tangled Web of the Boulder v. Suncor Cert Grant

Pass me some aspirin. Attorney General Rob Bonta might want some, too.

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to take up the Boulder v. Suncor Energy case, one of the growing set of state-law nuisance and consumer protection cases filed by states and municipalities against fossil fuel companies for harms from climate change.  The Court will review the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to allow the case …

CONTINUE READING

Has Trump Actually “Driven a Dagger Through the Heart” of Climate Policy?

Lee Zeldin

Don’t jump to conclusions based on the Administration’s spin operation.

there’s a good chance that the repeal of the Endangerment Finding will be reversed by the courts.  That would ground federal climate policy even more firmly in the law, so the Administration is taking a gamble.  Saying they’ve one is as premature as a roulette player who’s just put all their chips on one number announcing that they’re now rich before the wheel has even started turning. Even if the courts do uphold the repeal, a lot will depend on just what legal theory the judges adopt. Some legal theories would slam the door on efforts by future Democratic presidents. Others would leave room to move forward. 

CONTINUE READING

The Overlooked Precedent Supporting EPA Regulation of Greenhouse Gases

Even Roberts and Scalia agreed that Mass. v. EPA is the law

An important precedent has been overlooked in the coverage of the Trump EPA’s repeal of the 2009 Endangerment Finding. The 2009 finding relied was based on , in which the Court had held that the Clean Air Act covers air pollution and directed EPA to determine whether greenhouse gases are harmful. One reason to worry about the litigation is that the conservatives Justices all dissented from Massachusetts v. EPA over the repeal.  But there’s another equally important precedent: American Electric Power v. Connecticut (AEP). That ruling was joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Scalia, so it may carry more weight.

CONTINUE READING

A.I. Pollution in the Air — and the Public Comments

The Drain is a weekly roundup of environmental and climate news from Legal Planet.

Artificial intelligence has already replaced some artists, translators, and podcast hosts. Now it’s coming for… concerned citizens? That’s right. AI-assisted campaigns have started flooding the inbox of government agencies that seek to engage with the public. Do you remember last June when the South Coast Air Quality Management District Board killed two common sense clean …

CONTINUE READING

Join Our Mailing List

Climate policy is changing rapidly. Stay in the loop with expert analysis via email Monday - Friday.

TRENDING