Environmentalism Versus Science

 

French environmentalist logo

The French National Assembly yesterday voted to ban “fracking,” which extracts shale gas and oil by injecting water, chemicals, and sand into rock formations, and has received strong criticism from the environmental community.  So you would think that the action, taken by a conservative government, would have pleased environmentalists.

Apparently not:

Far from claiming victory, environmentalists and opposition Socialists accused the government of yielding to industry lobbying, because last-minute amendments to the draft law will allow scientific research to be conducted on shale gas and oil and its environmental impact, albeit under the control of state entities. The government will deliver an annual report to parliament on the conditions of this research, the first due by the end of the year.

They are complaining that the government still wants to conduct scientific research?  The potential dangers of fracking to the water supply are becoming clearer, but that is no reason to simply stop studying the matter.  The biggest problem, according to a Duke University report, is that gas leaks from shale wells into drinking water, which could create an explosion risk, and perhaps endanger potability. 

I suppose that the environmental community is worried that the new studies will whitewash the problem, and give the energy industry the excuse they need to move ahead.  Perhaps.  But it’s also possible that future technological development will improve the process to reduce environmental safety problems to an acceptable level.  Burying one’s head in the sand is bad environmentalism.

, , ,

Reader Comments

2 Replies to “Environmentalism Versus Science”

  1. Recent concerns about fugitive methane from an ever expanding web of extraction pipelines, serious increases in air pollution from (unregulated) drilling equipment, particularly bad in some basins, the disposal of lots and lots of very saline water post fracking, when the well is in production, spills of toxic frac water from the holding ponds at each well site (what is happening in Ark and LA this spring with all the rains and flooding), improper disposal of contaminated frac water after fracking into streams or sewers, leaking of very toxic chemicals at the well site or during transport . . . A lot of serious issues.

    But no one ever mentions the land use changes–which are huge. Hundreds of wells in a basin really change the “nature” of an area.

    Those rigs show up bringing money and meth.

Comments are closed.

About Jonathan

Jonathan Zasloff

Jonathan Zasloff teaches Torts, Land Use, Environmental Law, Comparative Urban Planning Law, Legal History, and Public Policy Clinic – Land Use, the Environment and Loc…

READ more

POSTS BY Jonathan