Judging the Environment

Defenders of WildlifeIt’s a tough job, but somebody’s got to do it.  Covering the Senate Republicans’ continuing obstruction of judicial nominees is about as exciting as watching paint dry, but the good folks at Defenders of Wildlife, one of the nation’s most venerable environmental organizations, have decided to invest in doing it, with their vital blog, Judging The Environment.  It’s run by staff attorney Glenn Sugameli.

Senate obstruction thrives in darkness: no one knows what is happening, so no one can complain.  JTE is trying to do what it can.  As they note:

Judicial appointments rarely are thought of as an environmental issue, but they have become an environmental priority. Because so many environmental enforcement issues end up in court, federal judges play a crucial role in deciding not only how to interpret and enforce, but also whether to uphold or strike down, the laws that protect our nation’s clean water, clean air, communities, and special natural places. Unfortunately, activist judges often place their interests first and prevent laws from being carried out as Congress intended.

Of course, Legal Planet readers have known this all along.  But Judging the Environment is useful for another reason: it continually highlights how Senate Republicans are not just blocking “controversial” nominees, but uncontroversial ones — nominees that have the support of both home state Senators, even extremely and radically right-wing home state Senators.

Consider Robert Bacharach, an Oklahoma magistrate judge nominated by President Obama last year to the Tenth Circuit.  Bacharach is about as non-ideological a candidate as there could be.  He has the support of both Tom Coburn and James Inhofe, whom no one would call tree-huggers.  And Senate Republicans filibustered him anyway.

Usually, in the wake of a clear an convincing election victory, minority party Senators will defer at least a little to the will of the public — especially if the President nominates indisputably centrist judges.  But the Senate GOP is not interested in such things.  That’s why Judging the Environment is an important source going forward.  Check it out.

, , , , , , , ,

Reader Comments

2 Replies to “Judging the Environment”

  1. Dear Jonathan,
    You are very harsh and insensitive to your fellow human beings who happen to be Republicans. I recommend more love and tolerance. We are all frail creatures with many faults and shortcomings. Let us strive to be more friendly and get along with each other.
    Have a good day and try to behave.

  2. Dear Jonathan,
    You are very harsh and insensitive to your fellow human beings who happen to be Republicans. I recommend more love and tolerance. We are all frail creatures with many faults and shortcomings. Let us strive to be more friendly and get along with each other.
    Have a good day and try to behave.

Comments are closed.

About Jonathan

Jonathan Zasloff teaches Torts, Land Use, Environmental Law, Comparative Urban Planning Law, Legal History, and Public Policy Clinic – Land Use, the Environment and Loc…

READ more

About Jonathan

Jonathan Zasloff teaches Torts, Land Use, Environmental Law, Comparative Urban Planning Law, Legal History, and Public Policy Clinic – Land Use, the Environment and Loc…

READ more

POSTS BY Jonathan