Los Angeles Heat Waves, Electricity Use and Climate Change

Heat-Wave-Hot-Weather---24161103It is 102 degrees in Los Angeles as I write this.  Not in the San Fernando Valley or in the communities east of Los Angeles whose temperatures are regularly several degrees higher but in downtown Los Angeles.  We’re in record heat territory and way above historical averages.  But temperatures aren’t the only records that are breaking.  Yesterday, the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power  reported that we used more megawatts of electricity than we ever have, breaking a four year old record.  We may exceed yesterday’s record again today.  The city is experiencing intermittent blackouts (though surprisingly few), with about 3300 residents currently without power.

The obvious question is whether our current heat wave is caused by climate change.  And the standard refrain of scientists is that it’s very difficult to link any individual weather event to global concentrations of greenhouse gases.  But what isn’t in dispute is that the kinds of temperatures Los Angeles is experiencing are completely consistent with a warming planet and are likely to grow in both frequency and intensity over the next decades.  Here’s some scary  data:  California average temperatures are predicted to increase 2 to 5 degrees Fahrenheit by the 2030s and up to 9 degrees by the end of the century.  Extreme heat events that used to occur once every 100 years are predicted to occur annually in the near future.  We’ll experience ten to fifteen times the number of  extreme heat days by 2050.  And lots of people will die as a result if we don’t figure out how to adapt:  more than 600 people died in a 2006 heat wave in Central California.  Researchers estimate that annual deaths from heat waves in California could reach 4,000 by 2025 and as many as 11,000 by 2050.

The single best way to reduce deaths from excess heat is also directly related to how we got into this environmental catastrophe in the first place:  air conditioning.  As long as the vast majority of our air conditioning relies on electricity generated from fossil fuels, our response to one of global warming’s dire effects, heat waves, will be to pump more greenhouse gases than ever into the atmosphere.   California is on a path to generate  a third of its electricity from renewable sources by 2030 and continues to be a national  leader in using less energy to produce the same amount of electricity as energy wasting states.  But California is hardly the only region in the world that will experience heat waves as the planet continues to warm.  The most recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change assessment predicted increasing heat waves across the globe with very high confidence.  All the while, air conditioning use around the world continues to explode, though the U.S. currently holds the dubious distinction of using more air conditioning than all other countries combined.  Over the next fifty years, global air conditioning demand could grow to be 50 times what the U.S. is currently using.  If that demand is met with fossil fuel-generated electricity, well, you should be able to figure out what that means for our efforts to curb global warming.

There’s another huge problem in relying on air conditioning to adapt to increasing temperatures.  It’s expensive.  That puts low income communities, especially the elderly, at much greater risk of serious and even fatal reactions to high temperatures.  France faced one of the worst and most catastrophic heat waves on record in 2003 and researchers estimate that of the 14,800 people who died (50,000 in all of Europe), more than 70 percent were over the age of 75.

The bottom line, as usual, is that we need to cut our greenhouse gases dramatically even in the face of increasing energy usage globally. We need to transition to an energy economy, globally, that is essentially carbon free by 2050.  A new report out today says we can do so with little to no cost by forgoing large infrastructure investments in traditional coal-fired power plants and investing instead in renewable energy and other clean energy infrastructure.  But we’ve got to do so almost immediately.

 

 

 

 

 

 

, , , ,

Reader Comments

4 Replies to “Los Angeles Heat Waves, Electricity Use and Climate Change”

  1. All true.
    Roof mounted photo voltaic panels can help since they produce power just when it’s needed i.e. at the hottest time of the day when the air conditioner load is greatest. They have a secondary plus in that they also provide shade. In my case half my roof is covered with PV and the roof space is also insulated. This does have a downside which is in the winter the house is cooler than it was before the panels and roof insulation were installed. I find I’m turning on the reverse cycle air con for heating a couple of days each winter whereas before I never needed to. A sad fact is the hotter it gets the less efficient these panels become, although this is small affect it is real and noticeable if you care to look for it (which is why east facing (i.e. morning sun) panels produce slightly more power than identical west facing ones which produce mostly in the hotter part of the day.
    None of this helps the divide between middle class vs low income.
    Best regards.

    1. Just to clarify: When I say facing east or west that is intended to mean east or west of the ideal direction (which in California would be south). In my case that is NE and NW (I live in the southern hemisphere with no true north facing roof surfaces on my home).
      Best regards.

  2. I am continually amazed to see people making “predictions” of future climate change, when there is no basis for any claims to the validity of such predictions.

    I understand that fear of the future, and the desire to control that unknown, motivate many people who are unwilling to accept that we must adapt to whatever nature throws at us, but I surprised that such superstitious nonsense is so popular. I guess it is just a fad, a current hysteria, and it will soon pass.

    Reality has a way of commanding our attention, despite our wishes.

    1. Dear PaulG

      We appreciate your observations and insight. For the record, there is no conclusive indisputable scientific proof that carbon dioxide is the driving force in climate change. I have often wondered how seemingly intelligent people become so obsessed with their visions of superstition and darkness, that they feel compelled to try and save the world. The article above repeats the same old familiar rhetoric that keeps getting repeated over and over again.

      Have a good day PaulG and thanks for your contribution to this forum.

Comments are closed.

About Ann

Ann Carlson

Ann Carlson is the Shirley Shapiro Professor of Environmental Law and the co-Faculty Director of the Emmett Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at UCLA School…

READ more

POSTS BY Ann