Two Months from Election Day

Who will get control of the Senate? And why does that matter for the environment?

We’re now two months from election day. This is a challenging electoral cycle for the Democrats, given inflation, the continuing effects of COVID, the economic impact of the war in Ukraine, and other woes. With turnout possibly boosted by the overruling of Roe v. Wade and other developments, Democrats do have a good chance of holding control of the Senate, depending on how they run individual races and whether there’s any improvement in public opinion on Biden.

When I took a look at the race in post in July, there were four races rated as toss-ups: Arizona, Georgia, Nevada, and Pennsylvania. The Democrats need to win at least three of the four. There were three other states that could also be considered in play: Wisconsin (leaning slightly Republican), New Hampshire (leaning Democratic), and North Carolina (learning Republican). As I noted then, given how close this many states were, even a small shift in the national political winds could make a big difference in terms of control of the Senate.

How have these races changed in that past two months? Of the toss-up states, the  clearest movement has been in Pennsylvania, which is now classified as leaning toward the Democratic candidate.  There are also signs that the Arizona race may be leaning in favor of the Democrat, though that’s less clear. The states that were leaning in July all still seem to be leaning the same way.  In short, the Senate remains very much up for grabs.

You’ve heard this before, but here’s a reminder of why Senate control matters for environmental policy even if Republicans take control of the House, There are two major reasons. The first is appointments. As Obama learned in his second term, Mitch McConnell is not about to give a Democratic president much space to appoint agency officials and lower court judges, let alone Supreme Court Justices.  That would augur poorly for staffing environmental agencies like EPA and for shifting the lower courts in a more regulation-friendly direction. Second, given that it looks unlikely Democrats will hold the House, committee hearings in a Democratic Senate might be the only forum in which scientists and environmental advocates would be allowed to speak.  It would also be the only place where government officials would have a chance to defend their policies.

 

 

 

 

 

, , ,

Reader Comments

2 Replies to “Two Months from Election Day”

  1. Dan, your most important initiative for the protection and perpetuation of the human race and an acceptable quality of life for all new generations is:

    “Where Berkeley falls short, in my view, is that there’s little leadership from the top and little structure at the campus level to organize climate efforts.”

    Thank You, I hope and pray that you and your colleagues will join together to make the right things happen in time.

    Academics truly are our last resort, especially because of political problems like those you point out in this post.

Comments are closed.

About Dan

Dan Farber has written and taught on environmental and constitutional law as well as about contracts, jurisprudence and legislation. Currently at Berkeley Law, he has al…

READ more

About Dan

Dan Farber has written and taught on environmental and constitutional law as well as about contracts, jurisprudence and legislation. Currently at Berkeley Law, he has al…

READ more

POSTS BY Dan