Scientific Integrity

The Accelerating Decline of U.S. Public Health Policy

Just when we get over our shock over one development, another comes along.

It’s hard to believe how quickly a science-driven approach to protecting health has been replaced by ideology and quackery.  Lack of expertise is now seen as a plus in making decisions, and the Administration is actively seeking to suppress information about problems that it would rather not address.  I posted a month ago about the current evidence-free approach to health policy,  Things have only gotten since then.  It’s been one bad thing after another. All of this in only a month. There are 34 months left in Trump’s presidency, so you can only imagine how dangerous the situation will be by the time he leaves office.

CONTINUE READING

MAHA’s Evidence-Free Health Policy

No matter how good your intentions, ignoring the evidence is a recipe for disaster.

It seems plain that key health agencies are now in the hands of earnest, well-meaning people who, unfortunately, don’t know what they’re talking about.  For example, the CDC’s advisory committee on vaccines is largely composed of anti-vaxxers. When the committee recently decided to eliminate a recommendation for Hepatitis B vaccines, none of the speakers who addressed the committee, and no one on the task force assigned to investigate the question, was an expert on the disease. 

CONTINUE READING

Rollin’ Coal!

One year in on Trump’s ‘Toxic First’ Agenda and the MAGA assault on environmental law.

They call it Rollin’ Coal — when you retrofit your diesel truck (and they are always trucks) to emit more pollution.  A lot more.  You may have seen the pictures: big dark clouds of fine particulates and a bounty of air toxics — a big f*#ck you to Prius drivers, environmentalists, and, well, all of …

CONTINUE READING

The War on Public Health Continues

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Friday’s layoffs announcements at CDC targeted infectious disease control

During the COVID outbreak, President Trump said, “If we stopped testing right now, we’d have very few cases, if any.”  That philosophy seems to have taken hold during his second term in office. On Friday, the Administration fired more than a thousand CDC workers, incljding the scientists and doctors who provide key information and expertise about infectious disease outbreaks.  The effect is to kneecap the government’s capacity to detect and track outbreaks.  

CONTINUE READING

Webinar: Climate Policy without the Endangerment Finding

UCLA Law’s “Up in the Air” webinar explores the future of federal and state climate policy if the endangerment finding is repealed.

As Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin rushes to rescind the endangerment finding — which some have called “the Holy Grail of U.S. climate policy” — the UCLA Emmett Institute hosted an expert panel discussion on the reasoning and ramifications of such a move.  The effort underlines “an extraordinarily dark time in U.S. environmental politics,” …

CONTINUE READING

In His Own Words: The Unitary Executive Explains Science Stuff to Us

Inside the government, the war on science seems to be over, and ignorance has won.

 In the past couple of days, the President has given us the benefit of his wisdom on highly technical issues. It seems clear that, as far as the government is concerned, the war on science is over, and ignorance has won.

I’m going to let the President make my case for me.  Below are excerpts of Trump’s explanations of vaccine policy, autism causation, and climate science.

CONTINUE READING

The War on Science: Week 35

Every week we get more reports about the Administration’s anti-science campaign.

It was just another week in the government’s war on science.  Rather than editorialize about what’s going on, I thought it would be more useful just to relay what has come out in news reports over the last week.  The facts really speak for themselves.

ITEM. On Saturday, we learned that EPA’s water division had told its scientists to pause publication of papers in scientific journals pending a “review.”  The order came from political appointees. There’s little doubt that the goal is to silence scientific findings that might call Administration policies into question.  

CONTINUE READING

National Academies School the Trump Administration on Gold-standard Science

Cover of the National Academies report

Report on Effects of Human-Caused GHG Emissions on US Climate, Health, and Welfare shows how actual science is done.

It’s not news that the Trump administration has little interest in getting the facts right. But facts often matter for crafting policy that serves our societal goals. And it’s not rare for the law to require that specific factual findings underpin government decisions. In both cases, we need to assemble, understand, and apply the best …

CONTINUE READING

Join Our Mailing List

Climate policy is changing rapidly. Stay in the loop with expert analysis via email Monday - Friday.

TRENDING

What does UUD mean?

A key legal standard in public lands law is being used by the Trump Administration to stop renewable energy, but in the long run the Administration’s position may advance environmentalists objectives.