NIMBYism
The Coming Ground War For Missing Middle Housing
Municipalities Continue to Maintain and Erect New Barriers To Homes For Working People
Last year, the California Legislature enacted SB 9, which required local governments to allow duplexes (and with ADUs, sometimes triplexes and quadraplexes) in single-family zones. Housing advocates rejoiced, and NIMBYs screamed that it was the end of the world and would lead to “Manhattanization” (because as we all know, Manhattan is famous for its duplexes). …
Continue reading “The Coming Ground War For Missing Middle Housing”
CONTINUE READINGEven Worse Than Duke
San Francisco Takes NIMBYism to a New Level
A few years ago, an episode of South Park saw Cartman attempting to rescue Kyle in San Francisco from a SMUG alert. It was, as it is so often, ahead of its time: The San Francisco Board of Supervisors on Tuesday unanimously rejected a 63-unit apartment complex, including 15 below-market-rate units, because it would cast …
Continue reading “Even Worse Than Duke”
CONTINUE READINGCEQA and Local Land Use Regulations: Shakedown Street
Local Government Discretion Has Powerful Political Support
Eric’s post the other day about CEQA and local land use regulation states an important and often-overlooked truth: environmental review can only hold up a project if it is discretionary. If local land use regulations state clearly what a developer can and cannot do, then no amount of environmental review could change a decision, and …
Continue reading “CEQA and Local Land Use Regulations: Shakedown Street”
CONTINUE READINGNIMBYs Gone Even Wilder!!!
Newport Beach Wants to Honor Veterans and Seniors by Excluding Them
Christmastime is here, and what better way to foster goodwill towards all than by trying to exclude affordable housing from your community. And not just any affordable housing: affordable housing for seniors and veterans: A plan for a 12-unit affordable housing project for veterans and seniors in the Newport Shores neighborhood was blasted by residents who complained …
Continue reading “NIMBYs Gone Even Wilder!!!”
CONTINUE READINGThe Uneasy Case for NIMBYism
A Growing Class Conflict Lurks Underneath the Land Use Debate
Paul Krugman is turning his attention to housing affordability, and the results as usual are salutary. When discussing the skyrocketing cost of housing in New York City, he observes: There’s still room to build, even in New York, especially upward. Yet while there is something of a building boom in the city, it’s far smaller …
Continue reading “The Uneasy Case for NIMBYism”
CONTINUE READINGNIMBYs Gone Wild!!
New Proposed Initiative Would Make Los Angeles a BANANA Republic
Los Angeles is in the midst of an affordable housing crisis: the city’s renters pay on average nearly half of their disposable income on rent alone. This threatens the city’s social and economic health: you simply cannot have a great city and hollow out its middle class. But NIMBYs never rest, and in the midst …
Continue reading “NIMBYs Gone Wild!!”
CONTINUE READINGHow Plaintiffs Can Win More Takings Cases: A Proposal for California
I’ve never been particularly sympathetic to regulatory takings claims; like many on the left of center, I’m wary of expanding a constitutional doctrine with the potential to severely injure good land-use planning and reconstitute Lochnerism. That said, it’s hard to look at the reports of many takings cases without getting a strong sense that a lot …
Continue reading “How Plaintiffs Can Win More Takings Cases: A Proposal for California”
CONTINUE READINGMayor Villaraigosa Betrays Environmentalism AGAIN
A few days ago, I noted that Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa likes to talk a good game when it comes to Greening the city, but conveniently abandons plans when they become politically difficult or require anything like a normal attention span. I was more right than I thought. I mentioned that the Mayor had …
Continue reading “Mayor Villaraigosa Betrays Environmentalism AGAIN”
CONTINUE READINGDon’t Give Up on the San Fernando Valley!
Ethan is surely right when he notes that MetroRail ridership in the San Fernando Valley: 1) isn’t as high as it should be; and 2) this results in part from a lack of leadership on land use. But I wouldn’t write the Valley off just yet. First, recall that there are only two Valley stations …
Continue reading “Don’t Give Up on the San Fernando Valley!”
CONTINUE READINGJoin Our Mailing List
Climate policy is changing rapidly. Stay in the loop with expert analysis via email Monday - Friday.
