Federal Climate Policy
Red States and the American Free Enterprise Chamber of Commerce are Climate Champions?
The hypocrisy in Iowa v. Wright is nauseating.
Guess which parties made the following arguments about climate change in a recently decided Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals case, Iowa v. Wright? A group of red states and the American Free Enterprise Chamber of Commerce (AMFREE). The case involves an obscure but important formula, known as the Petroleum Efficiency Factor (PEF), applied when automakers …
CONTINUE READINGThe Lingering Legal Issue of California’s Limits on Vehicle Emissions
The issues are complex, but the state has some strong legal arguments on its side.
The odds are high that the Trump Administration will withdraw California’s power to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from cars and trucks – and along with it, California’s effort to become all-electric. This is a crucial issue for the state because transportation accounts for about 40% of the state’s emissions. It’s also crucial for the other states have exercised the option of adopting California standards. The issues are complex, involving an unusual statutory scheme. Here’s what you need to know, and why I think California should win this fight.
CONTINUE READINGThe Tariff Case & Environmental Law
The Court’s ruling could open doors legally for some future environmental actions.
In passing a new statute, is Congress endorsing judicial rulings under the old one? Do restrictions on the regulatory powers of administrative agencies apply to foreign affairs or Presidential actions? Can courts review a President’s emergency actions? The oral argument in the Trump tariff case will provide clues into the Justice’s thinking on these key issues. The ultimate decision will have implications on other topics like environmental law. Here’s a roadmap to the issues.
CONTINUE READINGWill Technology Save Us? It Might Have To
Battery innovations provide at least some source for hope despite the Trump Administration’s war on renewable energy
There is little good out there, but it was nice to see this graphic recently. It’s a graphic of the daily energy usage in California broken down by source and by time period, according to the California Independent System Operator. That’s why you can see the yellow-gold area, representing solar capacity, expand during the daytime …
Continue reading “Will Technology Save Us? It Might Have To”
CONTINUE READINGGuess What? The Next 2 Weeks Are “National Energy Dominance Month”
October 17-31 has now been proclaimed to be an entire month, courtesy of Trump.
“National Energy Dominance Month.” So typical of Trump: a bungled exercise in foolish bravado. The “bungled” part is that they forgot to designate October as a special month until it was halfway over. The “bravado” saturates almost every sentence, combined with the fact that the blustering has no practical effect. And the “foolish” part is about bad energy policy and bad economics. To expand supply, he needs higher prices, but that would hurt him politically. And there’s no reason to think foreigners would pay them.
CONTINUE READINGQuiet Climate Policy
Just because climate change isn’t salient for most voters doesn’t mean policy isn’t important
This Substack post from Matthew Yglesias on climate policy gets, I think two things right and one thing wrong. And getting those three components of climate policy correct is, I believe, important to long term, politically sustainable success in addressing climate change. First, as Yglesias correctly notes, climate change is not a priority for most …
Continue reading “Quiet Climate Policy”
CONTINUE READINGLighting Candles in Dark Times: Environmental Law Centers in the Trump Era
These law school centers show it’s possible find ways to make a difference.
Environmental law have become vibrant parts of the law and policy ecosystem. At a time when despondency seems all too common, the work of these law school centers offers beacons of hope for the future of environmental protection. Some of that work is playing defense — pushing back against deregulatory efforts — while other work plays offense by identifying innovative directions for environmental policy. A comprehensive survey isn’t practical, but I’ll provide examples from several different centers.
CONTINUE READINGLearning from the Laureates
The 2025 Economics Prize, Technological Innovation, and the Energy Transition
In energy technology as elsewhere, Trump is hobbling American science with budget cuts and demands for political submission. The epitome of his approach is the decision to give political appointees rather than experts the ultimate decision on each project, replacing scientific merit with politics as the deciding factor. His war on science is also a war on future economic growth. And his effort to halt creative destruction is the pathway to a stagnant economy. By trying to prop up an incumbent industry threatened by new technologies, he’s undercutting a central driver of economic growth.
CONTINUE READINGFirst Monday? More Like ‘First Moanday.’
Since conservatives got a supermajority on the Supreme Court, it’s been on an anti-environmental tear.
Never say never. Maybe someday the Court will surprise us with a big win for the environment. But it would be foolish to count on that. We can also hope that the Court will do other good things, such as reining in Trump’s executive overreach. But it would be foolish to count on the Court to take a stand in favor of environmental protection.
CONTINUE READINGAt a Loss for Words? Resist Climate Silence
The Drain is a weekly roundup of environmental and climate news from Legal Planet.
A few years ago, I was writing about how President Joe Biden was flying around the country to promote his landmark climate law without uttering the word “climate.” Seems so quaint. Now, we find ourselves in a place where “climate change” is on a list of banned words maintained by the U.S. Energy Department, along …
Continue reading “At a Loss for Words? Resist Climate Silence”
CONTINUE READINGJoin Our Mailing List
Climate policy is changing rapidly. Stay in the loop with expert analysis via email Monday - Friday.
