Funny, It Doesn’t Look Bluish

The initial results in California last night make it seem like a sane drop of blue in the country.  Jerry Brown won for Governor; Barbara Boxer was re-elected; and Proposition 23, which would have reversed the state’s landmark climate change law, was resoundingly defeated.  Voters also approved Proposition 25, which allows the state budget to be approved by a simple majority — although retains the 2/3 requirement for tax increases.

But look closer.

Voters rejected Proposition 21, which would have raised the state’s vehicle license fee by a mere $18 to support California’s beleaguered state park system (which currently has a maintenance backlog of more than $1 billion); they approved Proposition 22, which prevents the state taking transportation monies from local governments and whole bunch of other stealth things to tighten the state’s budget; and most importantly, they approved Proposition 26, another stealth initiative sponsored by Chevron, Philip Morris, and Anheuser-Busch, which erases the distinction between “fees” and “taxes”, might undo this year’s budget deal, further restricts the state’s ability to raise revenue, and probably emasculates the state’s environmental agencies (potentially making the victory in Prop 23 meaningless).

Essentially, then, the voters have given formal political power to the Democrats, and told them to fix the state’s problems.  They then have tied the Democrats in a series of straitjackets and thrown them into the Pacific Ocean.

Good luck, Jerry; you’re going to need it.

, , , , , , ,

Reader Comments

3 Replies to “Funny, It Doesn’t Look Bluish”

  1. yea, it’s sorta sad how 21 turned out, especially if you take into account that 26 passed. I really do hope that people actually read the actual two page text of the law before voting for it. I am just curious where Californians believe they will get their money?

  2. I had originally thought to toss this into your “Tipping Point” post, but here will do pret’near as well.
    No party or group has a lock on jingoism. The appetite for that stuff is, I think, key.
    Boxer and Brown got in … the stealth props passed … sounds like realpolitik to me!

  3. The defeat of Prop 23 sends a strong message that corporations who want to cap and trade carbon dioxide emission credits can now relocate to California, create green jobs and profit from the global demand for low carbon technology. Other states will be watching closely to see if California’s bold action to save our planet is truly successful. Thanks California for leading the way.

Comments are closed.

About Jonathan

Jonathan Zasloff

Jonathan Zasloff teaches Torts, Land Use, Environmental Law, Comparative Urban Planning Law, Legal History, and Public Policy Clinic – Land Use, the Environment and Loc…

READ more

POSTS BY Jonathan